Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 715

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Calcific Aortic Stenosis With the Percutaneous Heart Valve

Open access
Cribier, Alain, Eltchaninoff, Helene, Tron, Christophe, Bauer, Fabrice, Agatiello, Carla, Nercolini, Deborah, Tapiero, Sydney, Litzler, Pierre-Yves, Bessou, Jean-Paul, Babaliaros, Vasilis·2006·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to study the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability of percutaneous heart valve (PHV) implantation in the aortic position. BACKGROUND We developed a PHV (equine pericardium valve in a balloon-expandable, stainless-steel stent) to treat patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS Thirty-six patients (aortic valve area < or =0.7 cm2, New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class IV, and severe comorbidities), formally declined for surgery, were recruited on a compassionate basis. The PHV was implanted by retrograde or antegrade trans-septal approach. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were assessed serially. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were implanted successfully (23 antegrade, 4 retrograde) in the subcoronary position with improvement in valve area (0.60 +/- 0.11 cm2 to 1.70 +/- 0.10 cm2, p < 0.0001) and transvalvular gradient (37 +/- 13 mm Hg to 9 +/- 2 mm Hg, p < 0.0001). Paravalvular aortic regurgitation was grade 0 to 1 (n = 10), grade 2 (n = 12), and grade 3 (n = 5). One week post-procedure, improvement in left ventricular function (45 +/- 18% to 53 +/- 14%, p = 0.02) was most pronounced in patients with ejection fraction <50% (35 +/- 10% to 50 +/- 16%, p < 0.0001). Thirty-day major adverse events after successful implantation were 26% (pericardial tamponade, stroke, arrhythmia, urosepsis, and one death unexplained at autopsy). Eleven patients are currently alive with follow-up of 9 months (n = 2), 10 months (n = 3), 11 months (n = 1), 12 months (n = 2), 23 months (n = 1), and 26 months (n = 2). All patients experienced amelioration of symptoms (>90% NYHA functional class I to II). Percutaneous heart valve function remained unchanged during follow-up, and no deaths were device-related. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous heart valve implantation is feasible in inoperable patients with end-stage AS leading to hemodynamic and clinical improvement. Continued advances and improved patient selection should decrease adverse events in the near future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.049

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 715

Metadata

Authors
Cribier, A., Eltchaninoff, H., Tron, C., Bauer, F., Agatiello, C., Nercolini, D., Tapiero, S., Litzler, P.-Y., Bessou, J.-P., & Babaliaros, V.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1214-1223
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W180423479
Cited by
715
References
1
FWCI
47.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Calcific Aortic Stenosis With the Percutaneous Heart Valve. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.049
The paper
Cribier, A., Eltchaninoff, H., Tron, C., Bauer, F., Agatiello, C., Nercolini, D., Tapiero, S., Litzler, P.-Y., Bessou, J.-P., & Babaliaros, V. (2006). Treatment of Calcific Aortic Stenosis With the Percutaneous Heart Valve. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.