Cited by 78Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Ventricular Repolarization Dynamicity Provides Independent Prognostic Information Toward Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Open access
Iacoviello, Massimo, Forleo, Cinzia, Guida, Pietro, Romito, Roberta, Sorgente, Antonio, Sorrentino, Sandro, Catucci, Silvana, Mastropasqua, Filippo +1 more·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this work was to evaluate whether ventricular repolarization dynamicity predicts major arrhythmic events in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).Background Arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with DCM is still an open issue. Ventricular repolarization analysis should provide relevant information, but QT interval and QT dispersion failed in predicting arrhythmic risk.Methods The following parameters were evaluated in 179 consecutive DCM patients without history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF) at enrollment: QRS duration, QT interval corrected for heart rate, and QT dispersion at electrocardiogram (ECG); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at echocardiogram; and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), heart rate variability (standard deviation of RR intervals), and ventricular repolarization dynamicity as measured by means of 24-h ECG monitoring, by calculating the slope of linear regression analysis of QT end and RR intervals (QTe-slope) and the value of mean QT end corrected for heart rate.Results During a mean follow-up of 39 months, 9 patients died suddenly and 15 experienced VT and/or VF. At multivariate analysis, LVEF (p = 0.047), NSVT (p = 0.022), and QTe-slope (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with arrhythmic events. Among the patients with a low LVEF, NSVT and/or steeper QTe-slope identified a subgroup at highest arrhythmic risk.Conclusions In patients with DCM, QT dynamicity is independently associated with the occurrence of major arrhythmic events and improves the predictive accuracy of stratifying arrhythmic risk of these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.071

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In NIDCM, the prognostic value of AECG is rather low and remains controversial.

    “in contradistinction to what is reported in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the prognostic value of AECG in NIDCM is rather low and remains controversial”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Goldberger et al., 2007

    The Abstract and Discussion report that QT dynamicity measured by 24-hour ECG independently predicts major arrhythmic events in dilated cardiomyopathy and improves risk prediction; the Discussion also identifies nonsustained ventricular tachycardia as an independent predictor. Although the paper calls risk stratification an open issue, its findings run contrary to the blanket claim that ambulatory ECG has rather low prognostic value in this population. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NSVT was associated with threefold higher risk of arrhythmic events during follow-up, and its prognostic value was enhanced by combination with low LVEF and abnormal QT dynamics.

    “Iacoviello et al. (2007) found that NSVT was associated with threefold higher risk of arrhythmic events during follow-up and that prognostic value of NSVT was enhanced by a combination with low LVEF and abnormal QT dynamics.”

    From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Iacoviello et al., 2007

    The Clinical correlates of QT dynamicity section reports that NSVT predicted major arrhythmic events and that combining NSVT with low LVEF and a steeper QTe-slope improved risk stratification. The Discussion (p. 230) likewise reports greater predictive value when these measures were combined. The passages do not establish the claimed threefold increase in risk specifically associated with NSVT. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]10. Pitzalis MV, Anaclerio M, Iacoviello M, et al. QT-interval prolonga- tion in right precordial leads: an additional electrocardiographic hallmark of Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1632-7.
  2. [17]17. Merri M, Moss A, Benhorin J, et al. Relation between ventricular repolarization duration and cardiac cycle length during 24-hour Holter recordings. Circulation 1992;85:1816 -21.
  3. [18]18. Di Diego JM, Antzelevitch C. High [Ca 2ϩ ] o -induced electrical heterogeneity and extra-systolic activity in isolated canine ventricular epicardium. Circulation 1994;89:1839 -50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacoviello, M., Forleo, C., Guida, P., Romito, R., Sorgente, A., Sorrentino, S., Catucci, S., Mastropasqua, F., & Pitzalis, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Iacoviello, Massimo
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
225-231
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075503497
Cited by
78
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmic risk stratification, sudden cardiac death, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction, QT dispersion, heart rate variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke Volume, Echocardiography, Doppler, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Linear Models, Survival Analysis, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Risk Assessment, Ventricular Remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review