Cited by 61Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Health and Mental Health

Driving and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks for Ventricular Arrhythmias

Open access
Albert, Christine M., Rosenthal, Lawrence, Calkins, Hugh, Steinberg, Jonathan S., Ruskin, Jeremy N., Wang, Paul, Muller, James E., Mittleman, Murray A.·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study examined the risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) associated with driving.Background Concerns regarding VT/VF occurring during driving are the basis for driving restrictions in ICD patients; however, limited data are available to inform recommendations.Methods This study used a prospective nested case-crossover design to compare the risk of ICD shock for VT/VF both during and up to 60 min after an episode of driving as compared with that during other activities among 1,188 ICD patients enrolled in the TOVA (Triggers of Ventricular Arrhythmia) study.Results Over a median follow-up of 562 days, there were 193 ICD shocks for VT/VF with data on exposure to driving before ICD shock. The absolute risk of ICD shock for VT/VF within 1 h of driving was estimated to be 1 episode per 25,116 person-hours spent driving. The ICD shocks for VT/VF were twice as likely to occur within 1 h of driving a car as compared with other times (relative risk [RR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57 to 3.18). This risk was specific for shocks for VT/VF and occurred primarily during the 30-min period after driving (RR 4.46, 95% CI 2.92 to 6.82) rather than during the driving episode itself (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.30).Conclusions Although the risk of ICD shock for VT/VF was transiently increased in the 30-min period after driving, the risk was not elevated during driving and the absolute risk was low. These data provide reassurance that driving by ICD patients should not translate into an important rate of personal or public injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.059

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Driving does not appear to increase the risk of ICD shock; in the prospective case-crossover TOVA study of more than 1000 ICD patients, although there was an elevated risk of ventricular arrhythmia in the 1 hour after driving (relative risk of 2.24), there was no increased risk of arrhythmia during the driving episodes themselves.

    “Driving does not appear to increase the risk of ICD shock; in the prospective case-crossover TOVA (Triggers of Ventricular Arrhythmia) study of >1000 ICD patients, although there was an elevated risk of ventricular arrhythmia in the 1 hour after driving (relative risk of 2.24), there was no increased risk of arrhythmia during the driving episodes themselves.88”

    From Managing with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (2013) · cites this paper as [88]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, et al., Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science of the American Heart Association. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare pro- fessionals from the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2004;109: 2655-71.
  2. Epstein AE, Miles WM, Benditt DG, et al. Personal and public safety issues related to arrhythmias that may affect consciousness: implica- tions for regulation and physician recommendations. Circulation 1996;94:1147-66.
  3. Gregoratos G, Cheitlin MD, Conill A, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: executive summary-a report of the American College of Cardiol- ogy/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guide- lines (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1175-209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albert, C. M., Rosenthal, L., Calkins, H., Steinberg, J. S., Ruskin, J. N., Wang, P., Muller, J. E., & Mittleman, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Albert, Christine M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
50
Issue
23
Pages
2233-2240
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1528538013
Cited by
61
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • St. Jude Medical
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL041016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, driving, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, driving restrictions, ICD patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Automobile Driving, Electric Countershock, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Ventricular Fibrillation, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Defibrillators, Implantable, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Risk Assessment, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review