Cited by 190Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Brugada Syndrome

Open access
Kusano, Kengo F., Taniyama, Makiko, Nakamura, Kazufumi, Miura, Daiji, Banba, Kimikazu, Nagase, Satoshi, Morita, Hiroshi, Nishii, Nobuhiro +15 more·2008·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The goal of our work was to examine the relationships of atrial fibrillation (AF) with genetic, clinical, and electrophysiological backgrounds in Brugada syndrome (BrS).Background Atrial fibrillation is often observed in patients with BrS and indicates that electrical abnormality might exist in the atrium as well as in the ventricle. SCN5A, a gene encoding the cardiac sodium channel, has been reported to be causally related to BrS. However, little is known about the relationships of atrial arrhythmias with genetic, clinical, and electrophysiological backgrounds of BrS.Methods Seventy-three BrS patients (49 +/- 12 years of age, men/women = 72/1) were studied. The existence of SCN5A mutation and clinical variables (syncopal episode, documented ventricular fibrillation [VF], and family history of sudden death) were compared with spontaneous AF episodes. Genetic and clinical variables were also compared with electrophysiologic (EP) parameters: atrial refractory period, interatrial conduction time (CT), repetitive atrial firing, and AF induction by atrial extra-stimulus testing.Results Spontaneous AF occurred in 10 (13.7%) of the BrS patients and SCN5A mutation was detected in 15 patients. Spontaneous AF was associated with higher incidence of syncopal episodes (60.0% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.03) and documented VF (40.0% vs. 14.3%, p < 0.05). SCN5A mutation was associated with prolonged CT (p < 0.03) and AF induction (p < 0.05) in EP study, but not related to the spontaneous AF episode and other clinical variables. In patients with documented VF, higher incidence of spontaneous AF (30.8% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.05), AF induction (53.8% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.03), and prolonged CT was observed.Conclusions Spontaneous AF and VF are closely linked clinically and electrophysiologically in BrS patients. Patients with spontaneous AF have more severe clinical backgrounds in BrS. SCN5A mutation is associated with electrical abnormality but not disease severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.060

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Brugada syndrome, spontaneous atrial fibrillation, occurring mostly at night, and atrial vulnerability are important predictors of ventricular fibrillation events that cause sudden cardiac death.

    “A study by Kusano and coworkers 32 examined the relationships of atrial fibrillation with genetic, clinical and electrophysiological backgrounds in BS and showed that spontaneous AF, occurring mostly at night, and atrial vulnerability are important predictors of VF events that cause sudden cardiac death.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P. Right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V1 through V3: a marker for sudden - death in patients without demonstrable structural heart disease. Circulation 1998;97:457-60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kusano, K. F., Taniyama, M., Nakamura, K., Miura, D., Banba, K., Nagase, S., Morita, H., Nishii, N., Watanabe, A., Tada, T., Murakami, M., Miyaji, K., Hiramatsu, S., Nakagawa, K., Tanaka, M., Miura, A., Kimura, H., Fuke, S., Sumita, W., Sakuragi, S., Urakawa, S., Iwasaki, J., & Ohe, T.
Affiliations
Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kusano, Kengo F.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
1169-1175
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2265361147
Cited by
190
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (17689026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
Brugada syndrome, atrial fibrillation, SCN5A mutation, cardiac sodium channel, ventricular fibrillation, syncope, interatrial conduction time, atrial refractory period, atrial arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Electrophysiology, Female, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Proteins, Mutation, Severity of Illness Index, Sodium Channels, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Brugada Syndrome, NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review