The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of Venous Congestion for Worsening of Renal Function in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Background Reduced cardiac output is traditionally believed to be the main determinant of worsening renal function (WRF) in advanced decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Objective To determine if venous congestion, rather than impairment of cardiac output, is primarily associated with the development of WRF in ADHF. Methods A total of 145 consecutive patients admitted with ADHF treated with intensive medical therapy guided by pulmonary artery catheter were studied. WRF was defined as an increase of serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl during hospitalization. Results In the study cohort (age 57 ±14 years, cardiac index 1.9 ±0.6 l/kg.m2, LVEF 20 ±8%, serum creatinine 1.7 ±0.9 mg/dl), 58 patients (40%) developed WRF. Patients who developed WRF had a higher central venous pressure on admission (CVP, 18 ±7 versus 12 ±6 mmHg, p<0.001) and after intensive medical therapy (11 ±8 versus 8 ±5 mmHg, p=0.04). The development of WRF occurred less frequently in patients that achieved a CVP <8 mmHg (p=0.01). Furthermore, the ability of CVP to stratify risk for development of WRF was apparent across the spectrum of systemic blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, and estimated glomerular filtration rates. Conclusions Venous congestion is the most important hemodynamic factor driving WRF in decompensated patients with advanced heart failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levey, A. S., Bosch, J. P., Lewis, J. B., Greene, T., Rogers, N., Roth, D., & for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group* (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 · Cited by 15,079
Cited by
Mullens, W., Damman, K., Harjola, V.-P., Mebazaa, A., Brunner-La Rocca, H.-P., Martens, P., Testani, J. M., Tang, W. H. W., Orso, F., Rossignol, P., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1369 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationTang, W. H. W., Wang, Z., Fan, Y., Levison, B., Hazen, J. E., Donahue, L. M., Wu, Y., & Hazen, S. L. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.617 · Cited by 681
Self-citationEzekowitz, J. A., O'Meara, E., McDonald, M. A., Abrams, H., Chan, M., Ducharme, A., Giannetti, N., Grzeslo, A., Hamilton, P. G., Heckman, G. A., et al. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.022 · Cited by 676
Heart failure and kidney dysfunction: epidemiology, mechanisms and management
Schefold, J. C., Filippatos, G., Hasenfuss, G., Anker, S. D., & von Haehling, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2016.113 · Cited by 671
Arrigo, M., Jessup, M., Mullens, W., Reza, N., Shah, A. M., Sliwa, K., & Mebazaa, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0151-7 · Cited by 574
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullens, W., Abrahams, Z., Francis, G. S., Sokos, G., Taylor, D. O., Starling, R. C., Young, J. B., & Tang, W. H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 589-596
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998846386
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 51.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of Venous Congestion for Worsening of Renal Function in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.068
- The paper
- Mullens, W., Abrahams, Z., Francis, G. S., Sokos, G., Taylor, D. O., Starling, R. C., Young, J. B., & Tang, W. H. W. (2009). Importance of Venous Congestion for Worsening of Renal Function in Advanced Decompensated Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
