The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cardiovascular Effect of Bans on Smoking in Public Places
Open accessAbstract
Objectives A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to determine the association between public smoking bans and risk for hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Background Secondhand smoke (SHS) is associated with a 30% increase in risk of AMI, which might be reduced by prohibiting smoking in work and public places.Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases plus bibliographies of relevant studies and reviews were searched for peer-reviewed original articles published from January 1, 2004, through April 30, 2009, using the search terms "smoking ban" and "heart" or "myocardial infarct." Investigators supplied additional data. All published peer-reviewed original studies identified were included. Incidence rates of AMI per 100,000 person-years before and after implementation of the smoking bans and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Random effects meta-analyses estimated the overall effect of the smoking bans. Funnel plot and meta-regression assessed heterogeneity among studies.Results Using 11 reports from 10 study locations, AMI risk decreased by 17% overall (IRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.92), with the greatest effect among younger individuals and nonsmokers. The IRR incrementally decreased 26% for each year of observation after ban implementation.Conclusions Smoking bans in public places and workplaces are significantly associated with a reduction in AMI incidence, particularly if enforced over several years.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The largest relative risk reductions were seen among younger persons and nonsmokers.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“In 2 separate meta-analyses of these studies, the pooled relative reduction in acute coronary events was 17% (95% CI, 8%, 25%).”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“Meta-regression suggested that benefits increased over time, with larger reductions in coronary events seen with longer durations of follow-up after the smoking ban was instituted.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“In sum, the studies reviewed in the IOM report401 and recent meta-analyses,412,413 in combination with several other more recent studies, provide convincing evidence that community smoking bans reduce rates of cardiovascular and smoking-related respiratory events, at least partly through lower exposure to secondhand smoke and possibly other concomitant effects (Table 8).”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“In all these studies, factors associated with the indoor smoking ban, such as related media reports or outreach efforts, were difficult or impossible to separate from the impact of the ban itself.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“The pooled analysis suggests a substantial overall pooled effect that increases over time.413”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
In the citing paper
“Several approaches have been effective, including (1) individual-oriented sessions to assess readiness for behavior change, collaboratively identify goals, and develop plans to achieve these goals; (2) a focus on specific, proximal goals for targeted behaviors; (3) self-monitoring with oral, written, and/or electronic feedback; (4) group sessions for peer support, group problem solving, and skill”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [413]
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Antman, E. M., Bassand, J., Klein, W. W., Ohman, M. E., Sendón, J. L. L., Rydén, L., Simoons, M. L., & Tendera, M. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00804-4 · Cited by 4,824
Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (2000) · Cited by 2,312
Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (1998) · Cited by 2,096
Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition
Rothman, K. J., Lash, T. L., & Greenland, S. (1986) · Cited by 1,736
Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐Analysis in Context
(2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470693926 · Cited by 1,693
Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review
Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188 · Cited by 1,072
Teo, K. K., Ôunpuu, S., Hawken, S., Pandey, M., Valentín, V., Hunt, D. U., Díaz, R., Rashed, W. A., Freeman, R. V., Jiang, L., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69249-0 · Cited by 999
Cardiovascular Effects of Secondhand Smoke: Nearly as Large as Smoking
Barnoya, J., & Glantz, S. A. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.492215 · Cited by 939
Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
He, J., Vupputuri, S., Allen, K., Prerost, M. R., Hughes, J., & Whelton, P. K. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903253401204 · Cited by 616
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Maurice, 2006, State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and secondhand smoke rules and policies in homes and workplaces—U.S., 2005, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 55, 1148
- 2009, Reduced hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction after implementation of a smoke-free ordinance, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 57, 1373
- Bietta, 2006, Abitudine al fumo: I dati della 123 ASI, BEN Notiziario ISS, 19, 1
- Valente, 2007, Exposure to fine and ultrafine particles from secondhand smoke in public places before and after the smoking ban, Italy 2005, Tob Control, 16, 312, 10.1136/tc.2006.019646 · DOI
- Burghuber, 1986, Platelet sensitivity to prostacycline in smokers and nonsmokers, JAMA, 90, 34
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Task Force Members, Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., Bugiardini, R., Crea, F., Cuisset, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · Cited by 4,510
Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Bhatt, D. L., Lópes, R. D., & Harrington, R. A. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.0358 · Cited by 869
Hackshaw, A. K., Morris, J. K., Boniface, S., Tang, J.-L., & Milenković, D. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j5855 · Cited by 658
Mozaffarian, D., Afshin, A., Benowitz, N. L., Bittner, V., Daniels, S. R., Franch, H. A., Jacobs, D. R., Kraus, W. E., Kris-Etherton, P. M., Krummel, D. A., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318260a20b · Cited by 601
Public health importance of triggers of myocardial infarction: a comparative risk assessment
Nawrot, T. S., Pérez, L., Künzli, N., Munters, E., & Nemery, B. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62296-9 · Cited by 535
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyers, D. G., Neuberger, J. S., & He, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meyers, David G.
- ORCID
- He, Jianghua
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1249-1255
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1457592498
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 32.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- public smoking bans, passive smoking, acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk, hospitalization, workplace smoking restrictions, non-smokers, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Admission, Public Facilities, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Incidence, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
