The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.
Tierney, J. F., Stewart, L. A., Ghersi, D., Burdett, S., & Sydes, M. R. (2007) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-8-16 · Cited by 6,208
Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates.
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219 · Cited by 3,203
Danaei, G., Ding, E. L., Mozaffarian, D., Taylor, B., Rehm, J., Murray, C. J. L., & Ezzati, M. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058 · Cited by 2,860
Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
DerSimonian, R., & Kacker, R. (2007) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004 · Cited by 2,374
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Editor's Choice – Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases
Riambau, V., Böckler, D., Brunkwall, J., Cao, P., Chiesa, R., Coppi, G., Czerny, M., Fraedrich, G., Haulon, S., Jacobs, M. J., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005 · Cited by 1,246
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases
Mazzolai, L., Teixido-Tura, G., Lanzi, S., Boc, V., Bossone, E., Brodmann, M., Bura-Rivière, A., De Backer, J., Deglise, S., Della Corte, A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 · Cited by 993
Goodney, P. P., Travis, L., Lucas, F. L., Fillinger, M. F., Goodman, D. C., Cronenwett, J. L., & Stone, D. H. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.033944 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, D., Martin, J., Shennib, H., Dunning, J., Muneretto, C., Schueler, S., Von Segesser, L., Sergeant, P., & Turina, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 986-1001
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W198249040
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 25.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.047
- The paper
- Cheng, D., Martin, J., Shennib, H., Dunning, J., Muneretto, C., Schueler, S., Von Segesser, L., Sergeant, P., & Turina, M. (2010). Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
