Cited by 121Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmias predict adverse outcome in real-world patients with implantable biventricular defibrillators

Open access
Santini, Massimo, Gasparini, Maurizio, Landolina, Maurizio, Lunati, Maurizio, Proclemer, Alessandro, Padeletti, Luigi, Catanzariti, Domenico, Molon, Giulio +4 more·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the correlation between atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial fibrillation (AF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D).Background In HF patients, AT and AF have high prevalence and are associated with compromised hemodynamic function.Methods Forty-four Italian cardiological centers followed up 1,193 patients who received a CRT-D according to current guidelines for advanced HF, New York Heart Association functional class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and QRS complex ≥ 120 ms. All patients were in sinus rhythm at implant.Results During a median follow-up period of 13 months, AT/AF >10 min occurred in 361 of 1,193 (30%) patients. The composite end point (deaths or HF hospitalizations) occurred in 174 of 1,193 (14.6%). Multivariate time-dependent Cox regression analyses showed that composite end point risk was higher among patients with device-detected AT/AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.16, p = 0.032), New York Heart Association functional class III or IV compared with II (HR: 2.09, p = 0.002), and absence of beta-blockers (HR: 1.36, p = 0.036). Furthermore, the composite end point risk was inversely associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 1.04, p = 0.045), increasing by a factor of 4% for each 1% decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction.Conclusions In HF patients with CRT-D, device-detected AT/AF is associated with a worse prognosis. Continuous device diagnostics monitoring and Web-based alerts may inform the physician of AT/AF occurrences and identify patients at risk of cardiac deterioration or patients with suboptimal rate or rhythm control. (Italian ClinicalService Project; NCT01007474).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.624

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santini, M., Gasparini, M., Landolina, M., Lunati, M., Proclemer, A., Padeletti, L., Catanzariti, D., Molon, G., Botto, G. L., La Rocca, L., Grammatico, A., & Boriani, G.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale San Filippo Neri (IT)
  • IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria (IT)
  • Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Medtronic (Italy) (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Santini, Massimo
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
167-172
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998626863
Cited by
121
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medtronic
  • St. Jude
  • Boston Scientific
  • Sorin SpA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial tachyarrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, CRT-D, heart failure, adverse clinical outcomes, mortality, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, beta-blockers, cardiac implantable electronic devices
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Stroke Volume, Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial, Time Factors, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Ventricular Function, Left, Defibrillators, Implantable, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review