Cited by 713Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Community Prevalence of Ideal Cardiovascular Health, by the American Heart Association Definition, and Relationship With Cardiovascular Disease Incidence

Open access
Folsom, Aaron R., Yatsuya, Hiroshi, Nettleton, Jennifer A., Lutsey, Pamela L., Cushman, Mary, Rosamond, Wayne D.·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health and its relationship with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).Background An American Heart Association committee recently set a goal to improve the cardiovascular health of Americans by 20% by 2020. The committee developed definitions of "ideal," "intermediate," and "poor" cardiovascular health for adults and children based on 7 CVD risk factors or health behaviors.Methods We used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort, age 45 to 64 years, to estimate the prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health in 1987 to 1989 and the corresponding incidence rates of CVD. Incident CVD comprised stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and fatal coronary disease.Results Among 12,744 participants initially free of CVD, only 0.1% had ideal cardiovascular health, 17.4% had intermediate cardiovascular health, and 82.5% had poor cardiovascular health. CVD incidence rates through 2007 showed a graded relationship with the ideal, intermediate, and poor categories and with the number of ideal health metrics present: rates were one-tenth as high in those with 6 ideal health metrics (3.9 per 1,000 person-years) compared with zero ideal health metrics (37.1 per 1,000 person-years).Conclusions In this community-based sample, few adults in 1987 to 1989 had ideal cardiovascular health by the new American Heart Association definition. Those who had the best levels of cardiovascular health nevertheless experienced relatively few events. Clearly, to achieve the American Heart Association goal of improving cardiovascular health by 20% by 2020, we will need to redouble nationwide primordial prevention efforts at the population and individual levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 713

Authors
Folsom, A. R., Yatsuya, H., Nettleton, J. A., Lutsey, P. L., Cushman, M., & Rosamond, W. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Folsom, Aaron R.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
57
Issue
16
Pages
1690-1696
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047241023
Cited by
713
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 47
FWCI
29.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-55015, N01-HC-55016, N01-HC-55018, N01-HC-55019, N01-HC-55020, N01-HC-55021, N01-HC-55022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
ideal cardiovascular health, cardiovascular disease incidence, cardiovascular risk factors, health behavior, primordial prevention, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, community prevalence, stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
American Heart Association, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review