Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Comparison of Allogeneic Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Open access
Hare, Joshua M., DiFede, Darcy L., Rieger, Angela C., Florea, Victoria, Landin, Ana M., El-Khorazaty, Jill, Khan, Aisha, Mushtaq, Muzammil, Lowery, Maureen H., Byrnes, John J., Hendel, Robert C., Cohen, Mauricio G., Alfonso, Carlos E., Valasaki, Krystalenia, Pujol, Marietsy V., Golpanian, Samuel, Ghersin, Eduard, Fishman, Joel E., Pattany, Pradip, Gomes, Samirah A., Delgado, Cindy, Miki, Roberto, Abuzeid, Fouad, Vidro-Casiano, Mayra, Premer, Courtney, Medina, Audrey, Porras, Valeria, Hatzistergos, Konstantinos E., Anderson, Erica, Mendizabal, Adam, Mitrani, Raul, Heldman, Alan W.·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have been tested in ischemic cardiomyopathy, few studies exist in chronic nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). OBJECTIVES: The authors conducted a randomized comparison of safety and efficacy of autologous (auto) versus allogeneic (allo) bone marrow-derived hMSCs in NIDCM. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to either allo- or auto-hMSCs in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were recruited between December 2011 and July 2015 at the University of Miami Hospital. Patients received hMSCs (100 million) by transendocardial stem cell injection in 10 left ventricular sites. Treated patients were evaluated at baseline, 30 days, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months for safety (serious adverse events [SAE]), and efficacy endpoints: ejection fraction, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, 6-min walk test, major adverse cardiac events, and immune biomarkers. RESULTS: There were no 30-day treatment-emergent SAEs. Twelve-month SAE incidence was 28.2% with allo-hMSCs versus 63.5% with auto-hMSCs (p = 0.1004 for the comparison). One allo-hMSC patient developed an elevated (>80) donor-specific calculated panel reactive antibody level. The ejection fraction increased in allo-hMSC patients by 8.0 percentage points (p = 0.004) compared with 5.4 with auto-hMSCs (p = 0.116; allo vs. auto p = 0.4887). The 6-min walk test increased with allo-hMSCs by 37.0 m (p = 0.04), but not auto-hMSCs at 7.3 m (p = 0.71; auto vs. allo p = 0.0168). MLHFQ score decreased in allo-hMSC (p = 0.0022) and auto-hMSC patients (p = 0.463; auto vs. allo p = 0.172). The major adverse cardiac event rate was lower, too, in the allo group (p = 0.0186 vs. auto). Tumor necrosis factor-α decreased (p = 0.0001 for each), to a greater extent with allo-hMSCs versus auto-hMSCs at 6 months (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated safety and clinically meaningful efficacy of allo-hMSC versus auto-hMSC in NIDCM patients. Pivotal trials of allo-hMSCs are warranted based on these results. (Percutaneous Stem Cell Injection Delivery Effects on Neomyogenesis in Dilated Cardiomyopathy [PoseidonDCM]; NCT01392625).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.009

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Hare, J. M., DiFede, D. L., Rieger, A. C., Florea, V., Landin, A. M., El-Khorazaty, J., Khan, A., Mushtaq, M., Lowery, M. H., Byrnes, J. J., Hendel, R. C., Cohen, M. G., Alfonso, C. E., Valasaki, K., Pujol, M. V., Golpanian, S., Ghersin, E., Fishman, J. E., Pattany, P., Gomes, S. A., Delgado, C., Miki, R., Abuzeid, F., Vidro-Casiano, M., Premer, C., Medina, A., Porras, V., Hatzistergos, K. E., Anderson, E., Mendizabal, A., Mitrani, R., & Heldman, A. W.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
526-537
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549128727
Cited by
355
References
32
FWCI
24.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparison of Allogeneic Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.009
The paper
Hare, J. M., DiFede, D. L., Rieger, A. C., Florea, V., Landin, A. M., El-Khorazaty, J., Khan, A., Mushtaq, M., Lowery, M. H., Byrnes, J. J., Hendel, R. C., Cohen, M. G., Alfonso, C. E., Valasaki, K., Pujol, M. V., Golpanian, S., Ghersin, E., Fishman, J. E., Pattany, P., . . . Heldman, A. W. (2017). Randomized Comparison of Allogeneic Versus Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.