Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 654

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

Open access
Navi, Babak B., Reiner, Anne S., Kamel, Hooman, Iadecola, Costantino, Okin, Peter M., Elkind, Mitchell S.V., Panageas, Katherine S., DeAngelis, Lisa M.·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The risk of arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer is incompletely understood. Objectives The authors aimed to better define this epidemiological relationship, including the effects of cancer stage. Methods Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database, we identified patients with a new primary diagnosis of breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, bladder, pancreatic, or gastric cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma from 2002 through 2011. They were individually matched by demographics and comorbidities to a Medicare enrollee without cancer, and each pair was followed through 2012. Validated diagnosis codes were used to identify arterial thromboembolism, defined as myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. Cumulative incidence rates were calculated using competing risk survival statistics. Cox hazards analysis was used to compare rates between groups at discrete time points. Results We identified 279,719 pairs of patients with cancer and matched controls. The 6-month cumulative incidence of arterial thromboembolism was 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6% to 4.8%) in patients with cancer compared to 2.2% (95% CI: 2.1% to 2.2%) in controls (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 2.1 to 2.3). The 6-month cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.9% to 2.0%) in patients with cancer compared with 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6% to 0.7%) in controls (HR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2.8 to 3.1). The 6-month cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 3.0% (95% CI: 2.9% to 3.1%) in patients with cancer compared to 1.6% (95% CI: 1.6% to 1.7%) in controls (HR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.8 to 2.0). Excess risk varied by cancer type (greatest for lung), correlated with cancer stage, and generally had resolved by 1 year. Conclusions Patients with incident cancer face a substantially increased short-term risk of arterial thromboembolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.047

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 654

Metadata

Authors
Navi, B. B., Reiner, A. S., Kamel, H., Iadecola, C., Okin, P. M., Elkind, M. S. V., Panageas, K. S., & DeAngelis, L. M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
70
Issue
8
Pages
926-938
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2746061356
Cited by
654
References
3
FWCI
45.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.047
The paper
Navi, B. B., Reiner, A. S., Kamel, H., Iadecola, C., Okin, P. M., Elkind, M. S. V., Panageas, K. S., & DeAngelis, L. M. (2017). Risk of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.