Cited by 412Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Open access
Strange, Geoff, Stewart, Simon, Celermajer, David, Prior, David, Scalia, Gregory M., Marwick, Thomas, Ilton, Marcus, Joseph, Majo +2 more·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Historical data suggesting poor survival in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who do not undergo treatment are largely confined to patients with severe AS.Objectives This study sought to determine the prognostic impact of all levels of native valvular AS.Methods Severity of AS was characterized by convention and by statistical distribution in 122,809 male patients (mean age 61 ± 17 years) and 118,494 female patients (mean age 62 ± 19 years), with measured aortic valve (AV) mean gradient, peak velocity, and/or area. The relationship between AS severity and survival was then examined during median 1,208 days (interquartile range: 598 to 2,177 days) of follow-up. Patients with previous aortic valve intervention were excluded.Results Overall, 16,129 (6.7%), 3,315 (1.4%), and 6,383 (2.6%) patients had mild, moderate, and severe AS, respectively. On an adjusted basis (vs. no AS; 5-year mortality 19%), patients with mild to severe AS had an increasing risk of long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.44 to 2.09; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The 5-year mortality was 56% and 67%, respectively, in those with moderate AS (mean gradient 20.0 to 39.0 mm Hg/peak velocity 3.0 to 3.9 m/s) and severe AS (≥40.0 mm Hg, ≥4.0 m/s, or AV area <1.0 cm 2 in low-flow, low-gradient severe AS). A markedly increased risk of death from all causes (5-year mortality >50%) and cardiovascular disease was evident from a mean AV gradient >20.0 mm Hg (moderate AS) after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction, and aortic regurgitation.Conclusions These data confirm that when left untreated, severe AS is associated with poor long-term survival. Moreover, they also suggest poor survival rates in patients with moderate AS. (National Echocardiographic Database of Australia [NEDA]; ACTRN12617001387314).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strange, G., Stewart, S., Celermajer, D., Prior, D., Scalia, G. M., Marwick, T., Ilton, M., Joseph, M., Codde, J., & Playford, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
  • Torrens University Australia (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Strange, Geoff
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
74
Issue
15
Pages
1851-1863
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972012128
Cited by
412
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 4
FWCI
30.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
aortic stenosis, moderate aortic stenosis, long-term survival, mortality, low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, cardiovascular mortality, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, aortic regurgitation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Australia, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke Volume, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review