Cited by 35Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Discordant Grading and Flow-Gradient Patterns in Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Open access
Stassen, Jan, Ewe, See Hooi, Singh, Gurpreet K., Butcher, Steele C., Hirasawa, Kensuke, Amanullah, Mohammed R., Pio, Stephan M., Sin, Kenny Y.K. +10 more·2022·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The prognostic implications of discordant grading in severe aortic stenosis (AS) are well known. However, the prevalence of different flow-gradient patterns and their prognostic implications in moderate AS are unknown.Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence and prognostic implications of different flow-gradient patterns in patients with moderate AS.Methods Patients with moderate AS (aortic valve area >1.0 and ≤1.5 cm 2) were identified and divided in 4 groups based on transvalvular mean gradient (MG), stroke volume index (SVi), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): concordant moderate AS (MG ≥20 mm Hg) and discordant moderate AS including 3 subgroups: normal-flow, low-gradient moderate AS (MG <20 mm Hg, SVi ≥35 mL/m 2, and LVEF ≥50%); "paradoxical" low-flow, low-gradient moderate AS (MG <20 mm Hg, SVi <35 mL/m 2, and LVEF ≥50%) and "classical" low-flow, low-gradient moderate AS (MG <20 mm Hg and LVEF <50%). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.Results Of 1,974 patients (age 73 ± 10 years, 51% men) with moderate AS, 788 (40%) had discordant grading, and these patients showed significantly higher mortality rates than patients with concordant moderate AS (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, "paradoxical" low-flow, low-gradient (HR: 1.458; 95% CI: 1.072-1.983; P = 0.014) and "classical" low-flow, low-gradient (HR: 1.710; 95% CI: 1.270-2.303; P < 0.001) patterns but not the normal-flow, low-gradient moderate AS pattern were independently associated with all-cause mortality.Conclusions Discordant grading is frequently (40%) observed in patients with moderate AS. Low-flow, low-gradient patterns account for an important proportion of the discordant cases and are associated with increased mortality. These findings underline the need for better phenotyping patients with discordant moderate AS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.036

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mild versus moderate discordant grading (moderate AVA 1.0-1.5 cm2 with mild gradient <20 mm Hg) occurs frequently in patients with moderate AS (20%-40%) and is associated with worse outcomes compared with concordant moderate AS.

    “Recently, it has been reported that mild versus moderate discordant grading (DG; ie, moderate AVA [1.0–1.5 cm2] with mild gradient [<20 mm Hg]) also occurs frequently in the subset of patients with moderate AS (20%–40% of patients) and is associated with worse outcomes compared with concordant moderate AS. 6 , 7”
  • Previous studies reported that 20% to 40% of patients with moderate aortic valve area had mild gradient.

    “These results are consistent with previous studies reporting that 20% to 40% of patients with moderate AVA had mild gradient. 6 , 7”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stassen, J., Ewe, S. H., Singh, G. K., Butcher, S. C., Hirasawa, K., Amanullah, M. R., Pio, S. M., Sin, K. Y. K., Ding, Z. P., Sia, C.-H., Chew, N. W. S., Kong, W. K. F., Poh, K. K., Leon, M. B., Pibarot, P., Delgado, V., Marsan, N. A., & Bax, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
  • National University Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Bax, Jeroen J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
80
Issue
7
Pages
666-676
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290724578
Cited by
35
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
moderate aortic stenosis, low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis, stroke volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction, all-cause mortality, prognosis, aortic valve area
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke Volume, Prevalence, Ventricular Function, Left, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review