Cited by 30Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAsthma and respiratory diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Duration of airborne Fel d 1 reduction after cat washing

Open access
Nageotte, Christian, Park, Michael, Havstad, Suzanne, Zoratti, Edward, Ownby, Dennis·2006·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.049

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bathing cats for three minutes using warm water and pet-specific shampoo can reduce airborne allergen levels by 40% to 79%, though this effect is transient-allergen levels rebound within 3 h and return to baseline within 24 h.

    “Bathing cats for three minutes using warm water and pet-specific shampoo can reduce airborne allergen levels by 40% to 79% [139,140], though this effect is transient—allergen levels rebound within 3 h and return to baseline within 24 h.”

    From Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control (2025) · cites this paper as [140]

    In “Duration of airborne Fel d 1 reduction after cat washing” (page unavailable), the cats were immersed in tap water, with their pelts massaged for three minutes, then immersed in fresh water for another three minutes; the paper does not specify warm water or pet shampoo. It reports a four- to fivefold reduction in airborne Fel d 1 at three hours and a return to baseline by 24 hours. The claimed 40%–79% range is not reported, and the allergen had not rebounded within three hours: that was the time of the significant reduction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nageotte, C., Park, M., Havstad, S., Zoratti, E., & Ownby, D.
Affiliations
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
521-522
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062367537
Cited by
30
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
Fel d 1, cat allergen, allergen reduction, house dust mites, allergen immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Allergens, Animals, Cats, Environmental Exposure, Female, Glycoproteins, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Water, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review