Cited by 18Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Does exposure to cats and dogs decrease the risk of allergic sensitization and disease?

Open access
Salo, Päivi M., Zeldin, Darryl C.·2009·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.08.012

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A school-based intervention may be cost-efficient given its relatively low cost and potential benefit.

    “Furthermore, given a school intervention can intervene in a community as opposed to individuals at home- the strategy regardless may be cost-efficient given the relatively low cost and potential benefit (62).”

    From Indoor Allergen Interventions in Homes and Schools for Managing Asthma (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The main text discusses pet-allergen exposure in schools and possible effects of community exposure on allergic outcomes, but it does not evaluate a school-based intervention. Searches for intervention costs and cost-efficiency found no passage addressing whether such a strategy would be inexpensive or beneficial. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Committee on the Assessment of Asthma and Indoor Air Indoor Biologic Exposures Clearing the Air: Asthma and Indoor Exposures 2000 105 222 National Academy Press Washington (DC)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salo, P. M., & Zeldin, D. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Zeldin, Darryl C.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
751-752
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992738387
Cited by
18
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01ES025041)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
pet exposure, cats, dogs, allergen sensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic diseases, early childhood, allergen exposure, disease prevention
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Cats, Dogs, Humans, Hypersensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review