Cited by 541Mast cells and histamineAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationUrticaria and Related Conditions

Histamine and H1-antihistamines: Celebrating a century of progress

Simons, F. Estelle R., Simons, Keith J.·2011·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

In this review we celebrate a century of progress since the initial description of the physiologic and pathologic roles of histamine and 70 years of progress since the introduction of H(1)-antihistamines for clinical use. We discuss histamine and clinically relevant information about the molecular mechanisms of action of H(1)-antihistamines as inverse agonists (not antagonists or blockers) with immunoregulatory effects. Unlike first (old)-generation H(1)-antihistamines introduced from 1942 to the mid-1980s, most of the second (new)-generation H(1)-antihistamines introduced subsequently have been investigated extensively with regard to clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety; moreover, they are relatively free from adverse effects and not causally linked with fatalities after overdose. Important advances include improved nasal and ophthalmic H(1)-antihistamines with rapid onset of action (in minutes) for allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis treatment, respectively, and effective and safe use of high (up to 4-fold) doses of oral second-generation H(1)-antihistamines for chronic urticaria treatment. New H(1)-antihistamines introduced for clinical use include oral formulations (bilastine and rupatadine), and ophthalmic formulations (alcaftadine and bepotastine). Clinical studies of H(3)-antihistamines with enhanced decongestant effects have been conducted in patients with allergic rhinitis. Additional novel compounds being studied include H(4)-antihistamines with ant…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both oral and intranasal H1 antihistamines have shown efficacy in NO in patients with allergic rhinitis, although the magnitude of benefit is modest compared with decongestants and intranasal corticosteroids.

    “Both oral and intranasal anti-H 1 have shown efficacy in NO in patients with AR [142,143], although the magnitude of the benefit is modest compared with decongestants and INCs [144].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [143]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons, F. E. R., & Simons, K. J.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Simons, F. Estelle R.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
1139-1150.e4
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026694261
Cited by
541
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
Keywords
histamine, histamine H1 receptor antagonists, inverse agonists, second-generation antihistamines, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, chronic urticaria, bilastine, rupatadine, alcaftadine, bepotastine, atopic dermatitis
MeSH terms
Histamine, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Anti-Allergic Agents, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review