Histamine and H1-antihistamines: Celebrating a century of progress
Abstract
In this review we celebrate a century of progress since the initial description of the physiologic and pathologic roles of histamine and 70 years of progress since the introduction of H(1)-antihistamines for clinical use. We discuss histamine and clinically relevant information about the molecular mechanisms of action of H(1)-antihistamines as inverse agonists (not antagonists or blockers) with immunoregulatory effects. Unlike first (old)-generation H(1)-antihistamines introduced from 1942 to the mid-1980s, most of the second (new)-generation H(1)-antihistamines introduced subsequently have been investigated extensively with regard to clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety; moreover, they are relatively free from adverse effects and not causally linked with fatalities after overdose. Important advances include improved nasal and ophthalmic H(1)-antihistamines with rapid onset of action (in minutes) for allergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis treatment, respectively, and effective and safe use of high (up to 4-fold) doses of oral second-generation H(1)-antihistamines for chronic urticaria treatment. New H(1)-antihistamines introduced for clinical use include oral formulations (bilastine and rupatadine), and ophthalmic formulations (alcaftadine and bepotastine). Clinical studies of H(3)-antihistamines with enhanced decongestant effects have been conducted in patients with allergic rhinitis. Additional novel compounds being studied include H(4)-antihistamines with ant…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both oral and intranasal H1 antihistamines have shown efficacy in NO in patients with allergic rhinitis, although the magnitude of benefit is modest compared with decongestants and intranasal corticosteroids.
“Both oral and intranasal anti-H 1 have shown efficacy in NO in patients with AR [142,143], although the magnitude of the benefit is modest compared with decongestants and INCs [144].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [143]
Cites
Tamura, M. K., Larive, B., Unruh, M. L., Stokes, J. B., Nissenson, A., Mehta, R. L., & Chertow, G. M. (2010) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.01090210 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clinical Practice Guideline: Allergic Rhinitis
Seidman, M. D., Gurgel, R. K., Lin, S. Y., Schwartz, S. R., Baroody, F. M., Bonner, J. R., Dawson, D. E., Dykewicz, M. S., Hackell, J. M., Han, J. K., et al. (2015) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599814561600 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Roberts, G., Xatzipsalti, M., Borrego, L. M., Custovic, A., Halken, S., Hellings, P. W., Papadopoulos, N. G., Rotiroti, G., Scadding, G., Timmermans, F., et al. (2013) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12235 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Review of the Treatment of Atopic Eczema
Lee, J. H., Son, S. W., & Cho, S. H. (2016) · Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research · doi:10.4168/aair.2016.8.3.181 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Mast cell mediators of significance in clinical practice in mastocytosis
Butterfield, J. H., Ravi, A., & Pongdee, T. (2018) · Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.iac.2018.04.011 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Barchuk, W. T., Salapatek, A. M., Ge, T., D'Angelo, P., & Liu, X. (2013) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.001 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Köchling, H., Schaper, K., Wilzopolski, J., Gutzmer, R., Werfel, T., Bäumer, W., Kietzmann, M., & Rossbach, K. (2017) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.04.004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simons, F. E. R., & Simons, K. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Simons, F. Estelle R.
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1139-1150.e4
- ISSN
- 0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026694261
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
- Keywords
- histamine, histamine H1 receptor antagonists, inverse agonists, second-generation antihistamines, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, chronic urticaria, bilastine, rupatadine, alcaftadine, bepotastine, atopic dermatitis
- MeSH terms
- Histamine, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Anti-Allergic Agents, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review