Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised phenotyping of Severe Asthma Research Program participants using expanded lung data

Open access
Wu, Wei, Bleecker, Eugene, Moore, Wendy, Busse, William W., Castro, Mario, Chung, Kian Fan, Calhoun, William J., Erzurum, Serpil, Gaston, Benjamin, Israel, Elliot, Curran-Everett, Douglas, Wenzel, Sally E.·2014·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Previous studies have identified asthma phenotypes based on small numbers of clinical, physiologic or inflammatory characteristics. However, no studies have utilized a wide range of variables using machine learning approaches. Objectives To identify subphenotypes of asthma utilizing blood, bronchoscopic, exhaled nitric oxide and clinical data from the Severe Asthma Research Program using unsupervised clustering, and then characterize them using supervised learning approaches. Methods Unsupervised clustering approaches were applied to 112 clinical, physiologic and inflammatory variables from 378 subjects. Variable selection and supervised learning techniques were employed to select relevant and nonredundant variables, address their predictive values, as well as the predictive value of the full variable set. Results Ten variable clusters and six subject clusters were identified, which differed and overlapped with previous clusters. Traditionally defined severe asthmatics distributed through subject Clusters 3–6. Cluster 4 identified early onset allergic asthmatics with low lung function and eosinophilic inflammation. Later onset, mostly severe asthmatics with nasal polyps and eosinophilia characterized Cluster 5. Cluster 6 asthmatics manifested persistent inflammation in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage and exacerbations despite high systemic corticosteroid use and side effects. Age of asthma onset, quality of life, symptoms, medications and health care utilization were some of the 51 nonredundant variables distinguishing subject clusters. These 51 variables classified test cases with 88% accuracy, compared to 93% accuracy with all 112 variables. Conclusion The unsupervised machine learning approaches used here provide unique insights into disease, confirming other approaches while revealing novel additional phenotypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.042

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Wu, W., Bleecker, E., Moore, W., Busse, W. W., Castro, M., Chung, K. F., Calhoun, W. J., Erzurum, S., Gaston, B., Israel, E., Curran-Everett, D., & Wenzel, S. E.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
1280-1288
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114695306
Cited by
310
References
19
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised phenotyping of Severe Asthma Research Program participants using expanded lung data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.042
The paper
Wu, W., Bleecker, E., Moore, W., Busse, W. W., Castro, M., Chung, K. F., Calhoun, W. J., Erzurum, S., Gaston, B., Israel, E., Curran-Everett, D., & Wenzel, S. E. (2014). Unsupervised phenotyping of Severe Asthma Research Program participants using expanded lung data. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.