Cited by 83Asthma and respiratory diseasesOccupational exposure and asthmaIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Early-life farm exposures and adult asthma and atopy in the Agricultural Lung Health Study

Open access
House, John S., Wyss, Annah B., Hoppin, Jane A., Richards, Marie, Long, Stuart, Umbach, David M., Henneberger, Paul K., Beane Freeman, Laura E. +4 more·2017·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Previous studies, mostly from Europe, suggest that early-life farming exposures protect against childhood asthma and allergy; few data exist on asthma and allergy in adults.Objective We sought to examine associations between early-life farming exposures and current asthma and atopy in an older adult US farming population.Methods We analyzed data from 1746 farmers and 1555 spouses (mean age, 63) from a case-control study nested within the Agricultural Health Study. Current asthma and early-life farming exposures were assessed via questionnaires. We defined atopy based on specific IgE > 0.70 IU/mL to at least 1 of 10 allergens measured in blood. We used logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, race, state (Iowa or North Carolina), and smoking (pack years), to estimate associations between early-life exposures and asthma (1198 cases and 2031 noncases) or atopy (578 cases and 2526 noncases).Results Exposure to the farming environment in utero and in early childhood had little or no association with asthma but was associated with reduced odds of atopy. The strongest association was seen for having a mother who performed farm activities while pregnant (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48-0.74) and remained significant in models with correlated early-life exposures including early childhood farm animal contact and raw milk consumption.Conclusions In a large US farming population, early-life farm exposures, particularly maternal farming activities while pregnant, were strongly associated with reduced risk of atopy in adults. These results extend previous work done primarily on childhood outcomes and suggest that protective associations of early-life farming exposures on atopy endure across the life course.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.036

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent U.S. case-control study found that farm exposure in utero and in early childhood protected against allergen sensitization but not asthma in adulthood.

    “In a recent U.S. case-control study, farm exposure in utero and in early childhood protected against allergen sensitization but not asthma in adulthood.648”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [648]

    The Abstract (Results) reports that in utero and early-childhood farm exposures were associated with reduced odds of atopy but had little or no association with adult asthma. The Discussion likewise describes an inverse association with allergic sensitization. Calling the exposure protective implies a causal effect that this case-control study does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
House, J. S., Wyss, A. B., Hoppin, J. A., Richards, M., Long, S., Umbach, D. M., Henneberger, P. K., Beane Freeman, L. E., Sandler, D. P., Long O'Connell, E., Barker-Cummings, C., & London, S. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
London, Stephanie J.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
249-256.e14
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2553529384
Cited by
83
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01es55546-20-0-5)
  • National Cancer Institute (Z01CP010119)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (N01 ES055546, Z01ES049030, ZIAES102385)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
adult asthma, atopy, prenatal exposure, raw milk consumption, specific IgE, life course, Agricultural Health Study
MeSH terms
Farms, Aged, Asthma, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Immunoglobulin E, Iowa, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Smoking, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review