Cited by 304Immune Response and InflammationGut microbiota and healthImmune responses and vaccinations

Natural immunity: Biodiversity loss and inflammatory diseases are two global megatrends that might be related

Open access
von Hertzen, Leena, Hanski, Ilkka, Haahtela, Tari·2011·The EMBO Reports

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/embor.2011.195

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biodiversity hypothesis emerged from observing sharp allergy prevalence contrasts between two adjacent areas, Finnish and Russian Karelia.

    “The biodiversity hypothesis [30, 31] emerged from observing the sharp allergy prevalence contrasts between two adjacent areas, Finnish and Russian Karelia [32].”

    From <scp>EAACI</scp> Guidelines on the Importance of Green Space in Urban Environments for Allergy and Asthma Prevention (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The 'Natural immunity' text proposes a biodiversity hypothesis, but the passage retrieved does not describe an allergy-prevalence contrast between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Searches for Karelia, the Finnish–Russian border, and the proposed origin of the hypothesis found no passage addressing that comparison in our copy (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Hertzen, L., Hanski, I., & Haahtela, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2011-10-07
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1089-1093
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W174675126
Cited by
304
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
natural immunity, biodiversity loss, inflammatory diseases, inflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Models, Biological, Public Health, Gastrointestinal Tract, Epigenesis, Genetic, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review