Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ImmunoCAP assays: Pros and cons in allergology

van Hage, Marianne, Hamsten, Carl, Valenta, Rudolf·2017·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Allergen-specific IgE measurements and the clinical history are the cornerstones of allergy diagnosis. During the past decades, both characterization and standardization of allergen extracts and assay technology have improved. Here we discuss the uses, advantages, misinterpretations, and limitations of ImmunoCAP IgE assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) in the field of allergology. They can be performed as singleplex (ImmunoCAP) and, for the last decade, as multiplex (Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip [ISAC]). The major benefit of ImmunoCAP is the obtained quantified allergen-specific IgE antibody level and the lack of interference from allergen-specific IgG antibodies. However, ImmunoCAP allergen extracts are limited to the composition of the extract. The introduction of allergen molecules has had a major effect on analytic specificity and allergy diagnosis. They are used in both singleplex ImmunoCAP and multiplex ImmunoCAP ISAC assays. The major advantage of ISAC is the comprehensive IgE pattern obtained with a minute amount of serum. The shortcomings are its semiquantitative measurements, lower linear range, and cost per assay. With respect to assay performance, ImmunoCAP allergen extracts are good screening tools, but allergen molecules dissect the IgE response on a molecular level and put allergy research on the map of precision medicine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Wide, 1967, Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibodies, Lancet, 2, 1105, 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90615-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Valenta, 1991, Recombinant allergens for immunoblot diagnosis of tree-pollen allergy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 88, 889, 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90245-J · DOI
  3. Hiller, 2002, Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment, FASEB J, 16, 414, 10.1096/fj.01-0711fje · DOI
  4. Klimek, 2015, Diagnostic test allergens used for in vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases are at risk: a European Perspective, Allergy, 70, 1329, 10.1111/all.12676 · DOI
  5. Wollmann, 2015, Natural clinical tolerance to peanut in African patients is caused by poor allergenic activity of peanut IgE, Allergy, 70, 638, 10.1111/all.12592 · DOI
  6. Asarnoj, 2017, Prediction of peanut allergy in adolescence by early childhood storage protein-specific IgE signatures: the BAMSE population-based birth cohort, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.973 · DOI
  7. Stringari, 2014, The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 134, 75, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.042 · DOI
  8. Matricardi, 2016, EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide, Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 27, 1, 10.1111/pai.12563 · DOI · Paper page
  9. van Hage, 2017, Performance evaluation of ImmunoCAP(R) ISAC 112: a multi-site study, Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, 571, 10.1515/cclm-2016-0586 · DOI
  10. Lupinek, 2014, Advances in allergen-microarray technology for diagnosis and monitoring of allergy: the MeDALL allergen-chip, Methods, 66, 106, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.10.008 · DOI
  11. Asarnoj, 2016, Sensitization to cat and dog allergen molecules in childhood and prediction of symptoms of cat and dog allergy in adolescence: a BAMSE/MeDALL study, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 137, 813, 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.052 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wollmann, 2015, Reduction in allergen-specific IgE binding as measured by microarray: a possible surrogate marker for effects of specific immunotherapy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 136, 806, 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.02.034 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
van Hage, M., Hamsten, C., & Valenta, R.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
140
Issue
4
Pages
974-977
ISSN
0091-6749
Cited by
175
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review