Novel Use of Chatbot Technology to Educate Patients Before Breast Biopsy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CAs provided informational, physical, and psychological support for cancer patients, potentially enhancing their health across various dimensions.
“reported that CAs provided informational, physical, and psychological support for them.”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Five studies showed that most patients were satisfied with the information provided by CAs.
“Five studies showed that most patients were satisfied with the information provided by CAs CAs were valuable, informative, and reliable (Bibault, Chaix, Guillemassé, et al. 2019;Chetlen et al. 2019;Greer et al. 2019;Siglen et al. 2023;Tawfik et al. 2023;Visvanathan et al. 2023).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
CAs were valuable, informative, and reliable.
“CAs were valuable, informative, and reliable (Bibault, Chaix, Guillemassé, et al. 2019;Chetlen et al. 2019;Greer et al. 2019;Siglen et al. 2023;Tawfik et al. 2023;Visvanathan et al. 2023).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Most patients said CAs were useful to enhance the quality of care.
“Most patients said that CAs were useful to improve their treatment adherence (Chaix et al. 2019(Chaix et al. , 2020)), enhance the quality of care (Chetlen et al. 2019), and facilitate self-management (Qiu et al. 2021).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Lifestyle and side effects of breast biopsy were the most frequently reviewed topics of 6 topics offered by CA.
“On topics of interest, lifestyle and side effects of breast biopsy were the most frequently reviewed topics of 6 topics offered by CA (Chetlen et al. 2019).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
One study found patients preferred using CAs on their smartphones, while another reported they frequently used computers or laptops to access CAs.
“One study found that patients preferred using CAs on their smartphones (Chetlen et al. 2019), while the other one reported they frequently used computers or laptops to access CAs (Goertz et al. 2023).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Most patients thought CAs helped them better understand their health conditions and treatment, enhancing their patient experience.
“Most patients thought CAs helped them better understand their health conditions and treatment, enhancing their patient experience (Chetlen et al. 2019).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Most included studies reported patient-perceived effectiveness of conversational agents.
“or reported patient-perceived effectiveness (Chaix et al. 2019(Chaix et al. , 2020;;Chetlen et al. 2019;Goertz et al. 2023;Greer et al. 2019;Qiu et al. 2021;Siglen et al. 2023;Soley et al. 2023;Visvanathan et al. 2023).”
From The Usability and Experience of Artificial Intelligence‐Based Conversational Agents in Health Education for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Chetlen et al. 2019
Cites
Granja, C., Janssen, W., & Johansen, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10235 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Juho Kim, J., Zhou, P., D. Kwon, Y., Hosny Saleh Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., et al. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
The Use of Chatbots in Oncological Care: A Narrative Review
Wang, A., Qian, Z., Briggs, L., Cole, A. P., Reis, L. O., & Trinh, Q.-D. (2023) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s408208 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Massa, P., de Souza Ferraz, D. A., Magno, L., Silva, A. P., Greco, M., Dourado, I., & Grangeiro, A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/41881 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Li, K., Wu, S., Zhang, Y., Zhu, B., Qi, Z., Hou, S., & Wang, W. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.70020 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chetlen, A., Artrip, R., Drury, B., Arbaiza, A., & Moore, M.
- Affiliations
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chetlen, Alison
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1305-1308
- ISSN
- 1546-1440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971715191
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Penn State Radiology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- chatbots, breast biopsy, patient education, pre-procedure information, touch screen tablets, frequently asked questions, patient-provider communication, breast imaging
- MeSH terms
- Biopsy, Needle, Breast Neoplasms, California, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Internet, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review