Cited by 53Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and AccessMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The relationship between mental disorders, quality of life, and pregnancy: findings from a nationally representative sample

Mota, Natalie, Cox, Brian J., Enns, Murray W., Calhoun, Laura, Sareen, Jitender·2008·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The present study examined health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the prevalence of mental disorders in pregnant and past-year pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women.Method Data came from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Three groups of women (ages 18-44) were compared: currently pregnant (n=451), past-year pregnant (n=1061), and not pregnant (n=10,544). Past-year mood, anxiety and substance use disorders were assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV version. HRQOL was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-12). All analyses included sociodemographics as covariates.Results Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that pregnant women were less likely than non-pregnant women to have depression and alcohol abuse or dependence; and less likely than past-year pregnant women to have depression and mania. Past-year pregnant women were less likely than non-pregnant women to have social phobia and alcohol dependence or abuse. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that pregnant and non-pregnant women had higher mental component scores than past-year pregnant women. Physical component scores were lower in pregnant women than in non-pregnant and past-year pregnant groups.Limitations This was a cross-sectional survey and the causality of relationships cannot be inferred.Conclusions Results suggest that pregnant women have a lower likelihood of mental disorder than both non-pregnant and past-year pregnant women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2007.12.002

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mota, N., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., Calhoun, L., & Sareen, J.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Sareen, Jitender
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
300-304
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073229508
Cited by
53
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
pregnancy, mental illness, health-related quality of life, depression, mania, anxiety disorders, social anxiety disorder, alcoholism, substance use disorders, mood disorders, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Quality of Life, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review