Cited by 81Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthEducation and Military Integration

Longitudinal study of resilience and mental health in Marines leaving military service

Hourani, Laurel, Bender, Randall H., Weimer, Belinda, Peeler, Russ, Bradshaw, Michael, Lane, Marian, Larson, Gerald·2012·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Despite a growing emphasis on psychological outcomes following military combat, few longitudinal studies have examined the combined role of risk and protective factors in the mental health of combat-exposed military personnel. This study characterizes the impact of resilience scale scores and combat exposure on mental health outcomes among Marines after separating from military service, along with intra-individual changes in mental health status.Methods Data were collected from longitudinal surveys of 475 active duty Marines attending a random sample of mandatory Transition Assistance Program workshops before leaving the military and responding to follow-up mail or web surveys an average of 6 months after returning to civilian life.Results Results revealed distinct risk and protective factors for those meeting screening criteria for mental health problems (depression, anxiety, and PTSD) and functional impairment at follow-up. Primary risk factors included experiencing higher levels of pre-separation combat exposure; post-separation stress across multiple life domains; and experiencing multiple areas of pain post-separation. Protective factors include having higher scores on pre-separation resilience and perceived social support at follow-up indices. We also identified a number of factors associated with change in mental health status from baseline to follow-up.Limitations Generality is limited by a lower than expected follow-up response rate and an exclusively Marine sample.Conclusion The role of resilience appeared to have a greater impact on functional impairment than on mental health symptoms per se. Findings provide important input for enhancing training programs and services intended to promote adjustment from military to civilian life. Additional emphasis on social support and coping with stress-related issues are needed in support of combat veterans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hourani, L., Bender, R. H., Weimer, B., Peeler, R., Bradshaw, M., Lane, M., & Larson, G.
Affiliations
  • RTI International (US)
  • Naval Health Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hourani, Laurel
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
154-165
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049791157
Cited by
81
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
resilience, mental health, combat veterans, Marines, military-to-civilian transition, combat exposure, social support, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, functional disability, pain, risk and protective factors, Transition Assistance Program
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Combat Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Military Personnel, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Support, Veterans, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review