The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression
Open accessAbstract
Background This study aimed to explore whether walking in nature may be beneficial for individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). Healthy adults demonstrate significant cognitive gains after nature walks, but it was unclear whether those same benefits would be achieved in a depressed sample as walking alone in nature might induce rumination, thereby worsening memory and mood.Methods Twenty individuals diagnosed with MDD participated in this study. At baseline, mood and short term memory span were assessed using the PANAS and the backwards digit span (BDS) task, respectively. Participants were then asked to think about an unresolved negative autobiographical event to prime rumination, prior to taking a 50-min walk in either a natural or urban setting. After the walk, mood and short-term memory span were reassessed. The following week, participants returned to the lab and repeated the entire procedure, but walked in the location not visited in the first session (i.e., a counterbalanced within-subjects design).Results Participants exhibited significant increases in memory span after the nature walk relative to the urban walk, p<.001, η(p)(2)=.53 (a large effect-size). Participants also showed increases in mood, but the mood effects did not correlate with the memory effects, suggesting separable mechanisms and replicating previous work.Limitations Sample size and participants' motivation.Conclusions These findings extend earlier work demonstrating the cognitive and affective benefits of interacting with nature to individuals with MDD. Therefore, interacting with nature may be useful clinically as a supplement to existing treatments for MDD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
Self-citationStress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7 · Cited by 5,990
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x · Cited by 5,172
Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00573-7 · Cited by 3,958
Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361886 · Cited by 3,717
The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x · Cited by 2,535 · cited 16×
“…at Baycrest, 3560 1 416 785 2500x3362. ll rights reserved. t al., Interacting with na 016/j.jad.2012.03.012 enhances cognitive functioning (Berman et al., 2008; Cimprich and Ronis, 2003; Kaplan and Berman, 2010; Taylor and Kuo, 2009) and specifically increases working-memory span and…”
InfluentialSelf-citationTop-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138071 · Cited by 2,380
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–803 of 803
Touching grass: Real-time effects of nature exposure on cognition, body image, and mood
Mian, M. H., Won, Y. Q., & Krug, I. (2026) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2026.102210
Meng, L., Hu, Y., Zhao, X., He, Z., Wang, J., Zeng, Q., Tang, Y., & Zeng, Z. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103255
Mental health benefits of forest visits and digital forest therapy: a narrative review
Gačal, H., Kurjaková, J., Vido, J., Pichlerová, M., Pichler, V., Kurjak, D., & Petrík, P. (2026) · Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.1007/s11676-026-02157-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., Kaplan, S., Sherdell, L., Gotlib, I. H., & Jonides, J.
- Affiliations
- Rotman Research Institute (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berman, Marc G.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 300-305
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3393816
- OpenAlex
- W2153140199
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 15.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- NIMH (MH60655)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, nature exposure, rumination, short-term memory, mood, autobiographical memory, nature-based interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Cities, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Trees, Walking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
