Cited by 65Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Protective benefits of mindfulness in emergency room personnel

Westphal, Maren, Bingisser, Martina-Barbara, Feng, Tianshu, Wall, Melanie, Blakley, Emily, Bingisser, Roland, Kleim, Birgit·2015·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Recent meta-analyses have found that mindfulness practice may reduce anxiety and depression in clinical populations and there is growing evidence that mindfulness may also improve well-being and quality of care in health professionals. This study examined whether mindfulness protects against the impact of work-related stress on mental health and burnout in emergency room (ER) nurses. Methods ER nurses (N=50) were recruited from an urban teaching hospital in Switzerland and completed a survey on work-related stressors, mindfulness, burnout, depression, and anxiety. Results The most frequently reported work-related stressor was interpersonal conflict. Nurses working more consecutive days since last taking time off were at greater risk for depression and those reporting more work-related interpersonal conflicts were at greater risk for burnout. Mindfulness was associated with reduced anxiety, depression, and burnout. Mindfulness was a significant predictor of anxiety, depression, and burnout and moderated the impact of work-related stressors on mental health and burnout. Limitations The sample is limited to nurses and results need to be replicated in other groups (e.g., medical staff or ambulance workers). We assessed clinical symptoms with questionnaires and it would be desirable to repeat this assessment with clinical diagnostic interviews. Conclusions The findings have implications for stress management in ER nurses and health professionals working in comparable se…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.038

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westphal, M., Bingisser, M.-B., Feng, T., Wall, M., Blakley, E., Bingisser, R., & Kleim, B.
Affiliations
  • Pace University (US)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Westphal, Maren
  • Kleim, Birgit
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
175
Pages
79-85
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023717294
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
mindfulness, burnout, emergency department nurses, occupational stress, occupational stressors, interpersonal conflict, depression, anxiety, mental health, psychological well-being, stress management
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, Conflict, Psychological, Depression, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Nurses, Switzerland, Young Adult, Mindfulness, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review