Cited by 72Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The Dutch Measure for quantification of Treatment Resistance in Depression (DM-TRD): an extension of the Maudsley Staging Method

Open access
Peeters, Frenk P.M.L., Ruhe, Henricus G., Wichers, Marieke, Abidi, Latifa, Kaub, Karin, van der Lande, H. Josephine, Spijker, Jan, Huibers, Marcus J.H. +1 more·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is common in daily practice. An empirical, widely accepted and applicable measure to quantify TRD is lacking. Previously, the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM) showed good validity. We aimed to improve the MSM by refining and extending its items resulting in the Dutch Measure for quantification of TRD (DM-TRD). Methods In addition to duration, severity and failed treatments in the current depressive episode, we added items for functional impairment, comorbid anxiety, personality disorders and psychosocial stressors. We extended the augmentation section and added items for failed psychotherapy and intensified treatment. We examined psychometric properties of the DM-TRD and tested prediction of future depressive symptoms and remission after 16 weeks in 274 (DSM-IV) depressed in- and outpatients entering naturalistic treatment. Results The DM-TRD showed excellent inter-/intra-rater reliability. Higher scores were associated with more symptoms and less remission during follow-up. The DM-TRD outperformed the MSM in prediction of future depressive symptomatology. Remission was predicted equally well by both measures. Longer duration of the current episode, larger functional impairment and larger baseline symptom severity were the strongest predictors of symptomatology at follow-up. Longer duration and larger functional impairment were negatively associated with remission. Limitations Longer follow-up could have increased predictive power. Addition of items for somatic co-morbidity, childhood adversity and psychotic features must be investigated further. Conclusion The DM-TRD has excellent psychometric properties and better predictive validity for clinical outcome than other sophisticated measure published to date. Its use in clinical practice and research will improve treatment planning in TRD-patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.019

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peeters, F. P. M. L., Ruhe, H. G., Wichers, M., Abidi, L., Kaub, K., van der Lande, H. J., Spijker, J., Huibers, M. J. H., & Schene, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Pro Persona (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Peeters, Frenk P.M.L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
205
Pages
365-371
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2516931522
Cited by
72
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw (016.126.059)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.126.059;)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, functional disability, anxiety comorbidity, personality disorders, psychosocial stressors, augmentation therapy, remission prediction, depressive episode duration, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Treatment Failure, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review