The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener GAD-7, based on a large German general population sample
Abstract
Background The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scales GAD-7 and GAD-2 are instruments for the assessment of anxiety. The aims of this study are to test psychometric properties of these questionnaires, to provide normative values, and to investigate associations with sociodemographic factors, quality of life, psychological variables, and behavioral factors.Methods A German community sample (n=9721) with an age range of 18-80 years was surveyed using the GAD-7 and several other questionnaires.Results Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the unidimensionality and measurement invariance of the GAD-7 across age and gender. Females were more anxious than males (mean scores: M=4.07 vs. M=3.01; effect size: d=0.33). There was no linear age trend. A total of 5.9% fulfilled the cut-off criterion of 10 and above. Anxiety was correlated with low quality of life, fatigue, low habitual optimism, physical complaints, sleep problems, low life satisfaction, low social support, low education, unemployment, and low income. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption were also associated with heightened anxiety, especially in women. When comparing the GAD-7 (7 items) with the ultra-short GAD-2 (2 items), the GAD-7 instrument was superior to the GAD-2 regarding several psychometric criteria.Limitations The response rate (33%) was low. Because of the cross-sectional character of the study, causal conclusions cannot be drawn. A further limitation is the lack of a gold standard for diagnosing anxiety.Conclusions The GAD-7 can be recommended for use in clinical research and routine.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale has demonstrated good psychometric properties in previous samples [21, 24, 46].”
From Internet videoconferencing delivered cognitive behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The GAD‐7 has high internal consistency (α = .85–.89: Hinz et al., 2017).”
From Associations between psychological inflexibility processes, pre‐sleep arousal and sleep quality. (2025) · cites this paper as Hinz et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · Cited by 35,234
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
A New Method for Measuring Daytime Sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Johns, M. W. (1991) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/14.6.540 · Cited by 17,364
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004 · Cited by 4,741
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Daig, 2013, Are urban dwellers more depressed and anxious than the rural population? Results of a representative survey, Psychother. Psychosom. Med., 63, 445
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pieh, C., Budimir, S., & Probst, T. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186 · Cited by 1,122
Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Miller, J. G., Hartman, T. K., Levita, L., Mason, L., Martinez, A. P., McKay, R., Stocks, T. V. A., et al. (2020) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2020.109 · Cited by 770
Johnson, S. U., Ulvenes, P. G., Øktedalen, T., & Hoffart, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01713 · Cited by 673
Bäuerle, A., Teufel, M., Musche, V., Weismüller, B., Kohler, H., Hetkamp, M., Dörrie, N., Schweda, A., & Skoda, E.-M. (2020) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdaa106 · Cited by 597
Anxiety and depression in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Karatzias, T., Bentall, R. P., Martinez, A., & Vallières, F. (2020) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13219 · Cited by 582
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinz, A., Klein, A. M., Brähler, E., Glaesmer, H., Luck, T., Riedel-Heller, S. G., Wirkner, K., & Hilbert, A.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hinz, Andreas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 210
- Pages
- 338-344
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2562471806
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Union
- European Regional Development Fund
- Free State of Saxony (713-241202, 14505/2470, 14575/2470)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- GAD-7, GAD-2, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety screening, psychometric properties, reference values, measurement invariance, sex differences in anxiety, quality of life, sleep disorders, social support, smoking, alcohol consumption, German general population
- MeSH terms
- Patient Health Questionnaire, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
