Cited by 582COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Anxiety and depression in the Republic of Ireland during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Open access
Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Karatzias, T., Bentall, R. P., Martinez, A., Vallières, F.·2020·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: The COVID‐19 pandemic in Ireland resulted in a nationwide quarantine on March 27, 2020. This study represents the first assessment of rates of anxiety and depression in the general population of Ireland during the pandemic. Aims: Our first aim was to estimate the probable prevalence rates of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and depression and to identify sociodemographic risk factors associated with screening positive for GAD or depression. Our second aim was to determine if COVID‐19 related anxiety was highest amongst those in society at greatest risk of morality from COVID‐19. Method: Self‐report data were collected from a nationally representative Irish sample ( N = 1041) online between March 31 and April 5; the first week of the nationwide quarantine measures. Recognized cut‐off scores on the GAD‐7 and PHQ‐9 were used to estimate rates of GAD and depression. Correlates of screening positive for GAD or depression were assessed using logistic regression analysis. Results: GAD (20.0%), depression (22.8%) and GAD or depression (27.7%) was common. Screening positive for GAD or depression was associated with younger age, female sex, loss of income due to COVID‐19, COVID‐19 infection and higher perceived risk of COVID‐19 infection. Citizens aged 65 and older had significantly higher levels of COVID‐19 related anxiety than adults aged 18–34. Conclusions: Initial results from this multi‐wave study monitoring changes in population anxiety and depression throughout the pandemic indicate that GAD and depression were common experiences in the population during the initial phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.13219

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of an acquaintance infected with COVID-19 in the immediate environment is one of the predictive factors of depression.

    “The presence of an acquaintance infected with COVID-19 in the immediate environment is one of the predictive factors of depression (Ghazawy et al. 2020, Hyland et al. 2020, Xiong et al. 2020).”

    From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Hyland et al. 2020

    The regression results (p. 12) and Discussion (pp. 13–14) associate having a loved one with a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection with screening positive for anxiety/depression. They do not establish an association with depression alone or specify that the infected person was an acquaintance in the respondent’s immediate environment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 18-24 age group has been shown to have higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress during the pandemic period, and there is a relationship between the quarantine period and depression, anxiety, and stress levels.

    “In the literature, the 18-24 age group has been shown to have higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress during the pandemic period, and there is a relationship between the quarantine period and depression, anxiety, and stress levels (Ghaza -wy et al. 2020, Hyland et al. 2020, Shah et al. 2021).”

    From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Hyland et al. 2020

    Table 1 (p. 17) shows that adults aged 18–24 had the highest rate of screening positive for combined anxiety/depression during Ireland’s early quarantine. The paper does not report stress levels or test whether the length of quarantine was related to these outcomes. For COVID-19-specific anxiety, it instead reports higher levels among adults aged 65 and older than among those aged 18–24 (COVID-19 anxiety, p. 12). (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar findings have been reported in studies from Ireland, the UK, and Denmark.

    “Similar findings have been reported in studies from Ireland [5], the UK [21], and Denmark [22].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 [press release]. Geneva: WHO2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Karatzias, T., Bentall, R. P., Martinez, A., & Vallières, F.
Affiliations
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Hyland, P.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-09
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
249-256
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W3044224654
Cited by
582
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 188 · 2020: 20
FWCI
49.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V004379/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, prevalence, sociodemographic risk factors, quarantine, perceived infection risk, income loss, older adults, Ireland
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quarantine, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review