Cited by 597COVID-19 and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Increased generalized anxiety, depression and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Germany.

Open access
Bäuerle, Alexander, Teufel, Martin, Musche, Venja, Weismüller, Benjamin, Kohler, Hannah, Hetkamp, Madeleine, Dörrie, Nora, Schweda, Adam +1 more·2020·Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the first cases of the novel coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 were reported in December 2019 in China, the virus has spread in most countries. The aim of the present study was to assess initial data on the mental health burden of the German public during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Germany and collected complete datasets from 15 704 German residents aged 18 years and over. Besides demographics, generalized anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-2) and psychological distress (DT) were assessed. Furthermore, COVID-19-related fear, trust in governmental actions to face COVID-19 and the subjective level of information regarding COVID-19 were covered. RESULTS: Significantly increased symptoms were highly prevalent in all dimensions: generalized anxiety (44.9%), depression (14.3%), psychological distress (65.2%) and COVID-19-related fear (59%). Females and younger people reported higher mental burden. Trust in governmental actions to face COVID-19 and the subjective level of information regarding COVID-19 are negatively associated with mental health burden. However, the subjective level of information regarding COVID-19 is positively associated with increased COVID-19-related fear. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of appropriate psychological interventions for those in need and the provision of transparency and comprehensible information are crucial during the current pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa106

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The previously described reduced wellbeing and quality of life in the general population during the pandemic did presumably apply also to the participants in this study.

    “The previously described reduced wellbeing and quality of life in the general population during the pandemic did presumably apply also to the participants in this study.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy in a psychiatric day hospital—A longitudinal naturalistic effectiveness trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The paper’s ‘Main finding of this study’ reports high levels of anxiety, depression and psychological distress in a German sample during the pandemic, supporting the claim of reduced mental wellbeing. Its ‘Measures’ section does not include quality of life, and the paper cannot establish whether the citing study’s participants experienced the same effects. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The average mental wellbeing and subjective quality of life decreased significantly in Germany during the COVID pandemic.

    “This is remarkable, considering that in the same time, due to the COVID pandemic and associated restrictions, the average mental wellbeing as well as subjective quality of life decreased significantly in Germany (26–28).”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy in a psychiatric day hospital—A longitudinal naturalistic effectiveness trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Main finding section reports higher prevalence of depression symptoms and psychological distress than in comparison German samples, supporting a decline in mental health during the pandemic. The Measures section assesses anxiety, depression and distress, but not subjective quality of life; the paper also does not establish a significant decrease in average wellbeing or attribute it specifically to restrictions. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bäuerle, A., Teufel, M., Musche, V., Weismüller, B., Kohler, H., Hetkamp, M., Dörrie, N., Schweda, A., & Skoda, E.-M.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen, Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
Corresponding author
Teufel, Martin
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
672-678
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3842
  • 1741-3850
OpenAlex
W3041048391
Cited by
597
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 190 · 2020: 24
FWCI
48.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Essen University Medicine Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health burden, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, psychological distress, public trust in government, COVID-19 information, sex differences, age differences, German population
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fear, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Access to Information, Trust, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review