Cited by 30Circadian rhythm and melatoninLight effects on plantsImpact of Light on Environment and Health

The effects of low-intensity narrow-band blue-light treatment compared to bright white-light treatment in seasonal affective disorder.

Open access
Meesters, Ybe, Duijzer, Wianne B., Hommes, Vanja·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Ever since a new photoreceptor was discovered with a highest sensitivity to 470-490 nm blue light, it has been speculated that blue light has some advantages in the treatment of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) over more traditional treatments. In this study we compared the effects of exposure to narrow-band blue light (BLUE) to those of broad-wavelength white light (BLT) in the treatment of SAD. Methods In a 15-day design, 45 patients suffering from SAD completed 30-min sessions of light treatment on 5 consecutive days. 21 subjects received white-light treatment (BLT, broad-wavelength without UV, 10 000 lx, irradiance 31.7 W/m 2), 24 subjects received narrow-band blue light (BLUE, 100 lx, irradiance 1.0 W/m 2). All participants completed weekly questionnaires concerning mood and energy levels, and were also assessed by means of the SIGH-SAD, which is the primary outcome measure. Results On day 15, SIGH-SAD ratings were significantly lower than on day 1 (BLT 73.2%, effect size 3.37; BLUE 67%, effect size 2.63), which outcomes were not statistically significant different between both conditions. Limitations Small sample size. Conclusions Light treatment is an effective treatment for SAD. The use of narrow-band blue light is equally effective as a treatment using bright white-light.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.024

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meesters, Y., Duijzer, W. B., & Hommes, V.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Meesters, Ybe
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
232
Pages
48-51
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792718478
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Keywords
seasonal affective disorder, phototherapy, mood, energy levels, blue-light photoreceptor
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Color, Female, Humans, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Ultraviolet Rays, Seasonal Affective Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review