Cited by 28Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Classification of attempted suicide by cluster analysis: a study of 888 suicide attempters presenting to the emergency department.

Kim, Hyeyoung, Kim, Bora, Kim, Se Hyun, Park, C. Hyung Keun, Kim, Eun Young, Ahn, Yong Min·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background It is essential to understand the latent structure of the population of suicide attempters for effective suicide prevention. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups among Korean suicide attempters in terms of the details of the suicide attempt.Methods A total of 888 people who attempted suicide and were subsequently treated in the emergency rooms of 17 medical centers between May and November of 2013 were included in the analysis. The variables assessed included demographic characteristics, clinical information, and details of the suicide attempt assessed by the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Cluster analysis was performed using the Ward method.Results Of the participants, 85.4% (n = 758) fell into a cluster characterized by less planning, low lethality methods, and ambivalence towards death ("impulsive"). The other cluster (n = 130) involved a more severe and well-planned attempt, used highly lethal methods, and took more precautions to avoid being interrupted ("planned"). The first cluster was dominated by women, while the second cluster was associated more with men, older age, and physical illness.Limitations We only included participants who visited the emergency department after their suicide attempt and had no missing values for SIS or C-SSRS.Conclusions Cluster analysis extracted two distinct subgroups of Korean suicide attempters showing different patterns of suicidal behaviors. Understanding that a significant portion of suicide attempts occur impulsively calls for new prevention strategies tailored to differing subgroup profiles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., Kim, B., Kim, S. H., Park, C. H. K., Kim, E. Y., & Ahn, Y. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Yong Min
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
235
Pages
184-190
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2795757371
Cited by
28
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
suicide attempts, impulsive suicide, suicide prevention, suicidal intent, suicide attempt lethality
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Death, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Suicide, Attempted, Cluster Analysis, Republic of Korea, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review