Cited by 198Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The hypothesis of a continuum in suicidality: a discussion on its validity and practical implications

Open access
Sveticic, Jerneja, Leo, Diego De·2012·Mental Illness

Abstract

The idea of a progression in suicide phenomena, from death wishes to suicide attempts and completed suicides, is quite old and widely present in literature. This model of interpreting suicidality has great relevance in preventative approaches, since it gives the opportunity of intercepting suicidal trajectories at several different stages. However, this may not be the case for many situations, and the hypothesis of a continuum can be true only in a limited number of cases, probably embedded with a specific psychopathological scenario ( e.g. depression) and with a frequency that should not permit generalisations. This paper reviews the available evidence about the existence and validity of this construct, and discusses its practical implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4081/mi.2012.e15

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The single PHQ-9 item has shown good specificity and reasonable sensitivity for screening suicidal ideation compared to a structured clinical interview.

    “We believe this was defensible, however, because when this item has been used to screen for suicidal ideation it has shown good specificity and reasonable sensitivity when compared to a structured clinical interview [41].”

    From Masculinity and suicidal thinking (2017) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sveticic, J., & Leo, D. D.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Mental Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-26
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
73-78
ISSN
  • 2036-7457 (ISSN-L)
  • 2036-7465
OpenAlex
W2148424413
Cited by
198
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mental Illness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicidality, continuum hypothesis, suicide prevention, suicide attempts, suicide mortality, death wish, depression, psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review