CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook–depression relations

Yoon, Sunkyung, Kleinman, Mary, Mertz, Jessica, Brannick, Michael·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Facebook depression is defined as feeling depressed upon too much exposure to Social networking sites (SNS). Researchers have argued that upward social comparisons made on SNS are the key to the Facebook depression phenomenon. To examine the relations between SNS usage and depression, we conducted 4 separate meta-analyses relating depression to: (1) time spent on SNS, (2) SNS checking frequency, (3) general and (4) upward social comparisons on SNS. We compared the four mean effect sizes in terms of magnitude.Methods Our literature search yielded 33 articles with a sample of 15,881 for time spent on SNS, 12 articles with a sample of 8041 for SNS checking frequency, and 5 articles with a sample of 1715 and 2298 for the general and the upward social comparison analyses, respectively.Results In both SNS-usage analyses, greater time spent on SNS and frequency of checking SNS were associated with higher levels of depression with a small effect size. Further, higher levels of depression were associated with greater general social comparisons on SNS with a small to medium effect, and greater upward social comparisons on SNS with a medium effect. Both social comparisons on SNS were more strongly related to depression than was time spent on SNS.Limitations Limitations include heterogeneity in effect sizes and a small number of samples for social comparison analyses.Conclusions Our results are consistent with the notion of 'Facebook depression phenomenon' and with the theoretical importance of social comparisons as an explanation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–355 of 355

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yoon, S., Kleinman, M., Mertz, J., & Brannick, M.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Yoon, Sunkyung
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
248
Pages
65-72
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026
OpenAlex
W2914027514
Cited by
355
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 11
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
social networking sites, depression, upward social comparison, time spent on social media, social media use
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Humans, Behavior, Addictive, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review