CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 340Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religion, spirituality and depression in prospective studies: A systematic review

Open access
Braam, Arjan W., Koenig, Harold G.·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many empirical studies have shown inverse associations between measures of religiousness and spirituality (R/S) and depression. Although the majority of these studies is cross-sectional, a considerable number of prospective studies have also appeared. METHODS: The current systematic review offers an overview of the major pattern of associations between the measures of R/S and depression / depressive symptoms in 152 prospective studies (until 2017). RESULTS: With on average two R/S measures per study (excluding measures of religious struggle, treated separately), 49% reported at least one significant association between R/S and better course of depression, 41% showed a non-significant association, and 10% indicated an association with more depression or mixed results. The estimated strength of these associations was modest (d = -0.18). Of the studies that included religious struggle, 59% reported a significant association with more depression (d = +0.30). Especially among persons identified with psychiatric symptoms, R/S was significantly more often protective (d = -0.37). In younger samples and in samples of patients with medical illness, R/S was less often protective. Studies with more extensive adjustment for confounding variables showed significantly more often associations with less depression. Geographical differences in the findings were not present. LIMITATIONS: Given the huge heterogeneity of studies (samples size, duration of follow-up), the current synthesis of evidence is only exploratory. CONCLUSION: In about half of studies, R/S predicted a significant but modest decrease in depression over time. Further inquiry into bi-directional associations between religious struggle and (clinical) depression over time seems warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Flowchart on the inclusion of papers for the current systematic review (note: 'Other sources' also included an EMBASE search [534 abstracts, 11 selected] with exclusion of papers that had also been identified in Pubmed and Psychinfo).
Fig. 1 Flowchart on the inclusion of papers for the current systematic review (note: 'Other sources' also included an EMBASE search [534 abstracts, 11 selected] with exclusion of papers that had also been identified in Pubmed and Psychinfo).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Braam, A. W., & Koenig, H. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Humanistic Studies (NL)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Braam, Arjan W.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
257
Pages
428-438
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063
OpenAlex
W2956051434
Cited by
340
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Humanistic Studies OAI Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, depression, depressive symptoms, religious struggle, course of depression, protective factors, psychiatric symptoms, disease, confounding adjustment, prospective study
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Prospective Studies, Religion, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review