Cited by 7Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The WHO/START study in New Caledonia: A psychological autopsy case series.

Open access
Goodfellow, Benjamin, Kõlves, Kairi, Selefen, Anne-Cécile, Massain, Tiffany, Amadéo, Stéphane, De Leo, Diego·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Limited information is available about suicidal behavior in the Pacific Islands. Forty percent of the New Caledonian population is indigenous Kanak; insights into the characteristics of suicide deaths in this population compared to other ethnic groups would be valuable. The aim of this paper is to deepen our understanding of the cultural underpinnings of suicide in New Caledonia by presenting the results of the WHO/START psychological autopsy study.Method A case-series psychological autopsy study was conducted based on medical, police files, and interviews with relatives of 52 individuals who died by suicide in 2014 and 2015 in New Caledonia.Results Kanak indigenous individuals represented more than half of suicides. Prevalence of mental disorders was identified in 62% of suicide decedents; a previous suicide attempt was frequent (37% of cases). A serious argument with a partner was the most prevalent life event (60%). Few warning signs were present among young people and Kanak in general.Conclusion Comparison with information on the general population suggests indigenous Kanak are more vulnerable and that having a mental health disorder plays an important role in suicide. Violent arguments with a partner could also be a major risk factor. Traditional protective factors (being employed, living with their family or partner, religion) appeared to have limited effect on suicide. Mental health promotion, prevention, and care should be prioritized. Prevention strategies, including domestic violence prevention are recommended in New Caledonia. Further research is needed to better identify young and Kanak subjects at risk of suicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.020

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodfellow, B., Kõlves, K., Selefen, A.-C., Massain, T., Amadéo, S., & De Leo, D.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Gouvernement de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (NC)
Corresponding author
Goodfellow, Benjamin
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
262
Pages
366-372
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985943720
Cited by
7
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
suicide, Kanak people, indigenous peoples, Pacific Islands, New Caledonia, psychological autopsy, mental illness, suicide attempts, intimate partner conflict, warning signs, suicide prevention, domestic violence, cultural factors in suicide, protective factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Autopsy, Mental Disorders, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Caledonia, Research Design, Risk Factors, Suicide, Violence, Prevalence, Population Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review