Cited by 53Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) on cognitive control

Open access
Corlier, Juliana, Burnette, Elizabeth, Wilson, Andrew C., Lou, Jerry J., Landeros, Adrian, Minzenberg, Michael J., Leuchter, Andrew F.·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is commonly accompanied by cognitive control dysfunction that may persist after remission of clinical symptoms with antidepressant medication treatment. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment alternative for medication-resistant MDD. In this study, we investigated whether rTMS treatment had a beneficial effect not only on depressive symptoms, but on also cognitive control dysfunction. Methods 77 subjects with MDD received a 30-session treatment course of 10 Hz rTMS administered at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (IDS-SR) before and after treatment, with clinical response defined as 50% or greater decrease in the IDS-SR score at treatment 30. Cognitive control function was assessed before and after treatment using the Stroop word-color interference task. We examined changes in Stroop accuracy and reaction time for congruent and incongruent trials, as well as in relation to changes in depressive symptoms. Results Performance accuracy improved particularly for the rTMS responders in the incongruent condition, with older subjects benefitting most from the rTMS treatment. Improvement in reaction times was positively associated with clinical improvement, especially in the incongruent condition. Limitations We used a single cognitive task in a naturalistic setting without control for individual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.068

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corlier, J., Burnette, E., Wilson, A. C., Lou, J. J., Landeros, A., Minzenberg, M. J., & Leuchter, A. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Corlier, Juliana
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
265
Pages
272-277
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000082129
Cited by
53
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Neuromodulation Postdoctoral Scholar Fund
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Department of Defense
  • CHDI Foundation
  • NeuroSigma, Inc.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, major depressive disorder, cognitive control, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Stroop interference, psychomotor speed, treatment response, age differences
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review