Distinguishing distress from disorder: Black-white patterns in the determinants of and links between depressive symptoms and major depression
Abstract
Background Black Americans experience higher levels of psychological distress but similar or lower rates of psychiatric disorders than Whites. This study aimed to clarify discordant distress-disorder patterns by distinguishing the sociodemographic and psychosocial risks (e.g. socioeconomic status, stress exposure) associated with distress and disorder among Blacks and Whites and by evaluating the distress-disorder linkage within and across racial groups. Methods Secondary analysis of the Nashville Stress and Health Study (n=1,246), a cross-sectional community epidemiologic survey of Blacks and Whites in Nashville, Tennessee, was used to assess distress (CES-D depressive symptoms scale) and major depressive disorder (MDD; based on the CIDI). Race-stratified models assessed correlates of each outcome and the distress-disorder association among racial groups; interactions considered potential moderating effects of SES and stress exposure on this association within each group. Results Distress and disorder were differentially shaped by risk factors and varied by race. Increases in distress were associated with greater disorder risk among both racial groups. However, a significant interaction between distress and stress exposure indicated that odds of "chronic" MDD (lifetime and past-year prevalence) depends on level of stress exposure for Blacks only. Conclusions This study informs the "race paradox in mental health" by demonstrating that distress and disorder have etiologies tha…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large body of research documents that Black Americans often report positive mental health despite limited socioeconomic resources, high social stress exposure, and poor physical health.
“A substantial body of research has documented paradoxical health patterns among Black Americans such that this group generally reports positive mental health (i.e., a lower prevalence of psychiatric disorders) despite limited socioeconomic resources, heightened exposure to social stress, and poor physical health outcomes”
From Is John Henryism a Health Risk or Resource?: Exploring the Role of Culturally Relevant Coping for Physical and Mental Health among Black Americans. (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas Tobin 2021
High levels of psychological distress and poor physical health tend to be prevalent among Black Americans.
“At the same time, high levels of psychological distress (i.e., depressive symptoms) and poor physical health tend to be prevalent among this group (Barnes and Bates 2017; Mouzon et al. 2016; Thomas Tobin 2021; Thomas Tobin et al. 2020).”
From Is John Henryism a Health Risk or Resource?: Exploring the Role of Culturally Relevant Coping for Physical and Mental Health among Black Americans. (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas Tobin 2021
Cites
Psychological distress: concept analysis
Ridner, S. H. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02938.x · Cited by 822 · see citing works
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HEALTH: How Much Does Stress Really Matter?
Sternthal, M. J., Slopen, N., & Williams, D. R. (2011) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x11000087 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Banks, K. H., Kohn-Wood, L. P., & Spencer, M. (2006) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-006-9052-9 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Barnes, D. M., & Bates, L. M. (2017) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-017-1394-9 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Personal Resources and Depression in the Transition to Adulthood: Ethnic Comparisons
Turner, R. J., Taylor, J., & Van Gundy, K. (2004) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650404500103 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robinson, M. N., & Thomas Tobin, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/00221465211009142 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tobin, C. S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tobin, Courtney S. Thomas
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 279
- Pages
- 510-517
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094194961
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, psychological distress, African Americans, racial disparities, stress exposure, socioeconomic status, chronic depression
- MeSH terms
- Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review