Cited by 20Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Distinguishing distress from disorder: Black-white patterns in the determinants of and links between depressive symptoms and major depression

Tobin, Courtney S. Thomas·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Black Americans experience higher levels of psychological distress but similar or lower rates of psychiatric disorders than Whites. This study aimed to clarify discordant distress-disorder patterns by distinguishing the sociodemographic and psychosocial risks (e.g. socioeconomic status, stress exposure) associated with distress and disorder among Blacks and Whites and by evaluating the distress-disorder linkage within and across racial groups. Methods Secondary analysis of the Nashville Stress and Health Study (n=1,246), a cross-sectional community epidemiologic survey of Blacks and Whites in Nashville, Tennessee, was used to assess distress (CES-D depressive symptoms scale) and major depressive disorder (MDD; based on the CIDI). Race-stratified models assessed correlates of each outcome and the distress-disorder association among racial groups; interactions considered potential moderating effects of SES and stress exposure on this association within each group. Results Distress and disorder were differentially shaped by risk factors and varied by race. Increases in distress were associated with greater disorder risk among both racial groups. However, a significant interaction between distress and stress exposure indicated that odds of "chronic" MDD (lifetime and past-year prevalence) depends on level of stress exposure for Blacks only. Conclusions This study informs the "race paradox in mental health" by demonstrating that distress and disorder have etiologies tha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.035

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobin, C. S. T.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Tobin, Courtney S. Thomas
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
279
Pages
510-517
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094194961
Cited by
20
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, psychological distress, African Americans, racial disparities, stress exposure, socioeconomic status, chronic depression
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review