Cited by 364Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

An examination of the African American experience of everyday discrimination and symptoms of psychological distress

Banks, Kira Hudson, Kohn-Wood, Laura P., Spencer, Michael·2006·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Current theoretical models suggest that the most potent and impacting discrimination experienced by African Americans in the post Jim Crow era are subtle and unconscious forms of discrimination that are experienced on a daily basis. This study investigates the relationship between perceived everyday discrimination and anxiety and depressive symptoms. Further, we examine gender as a moderator of this relationship. Data come from the 1995 Detroit Area Study data with 570 African American respondents. Results indicate that perceived discrimination is directly related to both symptoms of depression and anxiety. Gender moderates the relationship between discrimination and anxiety symptoms, but not discrimination and depressive symptoms. Overall, different patterns of relationships were apparent for men and women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-006-9052-9

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial processes can be pre-existing vulnerability factors or can emerge in response to ongoing pain.

    “In the first category, psychosocial processes either exist within an individual as pre-existing “vulnerability” factor [e.g., distress20–22, trauma23, 24] or emerge for the first time in response to the experience of ongoing pain [e.g., fear-avoidance behavior 25, self-efficacy26, 27].”
  • Higher pre-surgical emotional distress is associated with greater postsurgical pain and impairment.

    “higher levels of pre-surgical emotional distress were associated with more postsurgical pain and impairment 20, 40.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banks, K. H., Kohn-Wood, L. P., & Spencer, M.
Affiliations
  • Illinois Wesleyan University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Banks, Kira Hudson
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2006-08-04
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
555-570
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W1985110427
Cited by
364
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
30.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons at Illinois Wesleyan University (Illinois Wesleyan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
African Americans, everyday discrimination, perceived discrimination, psychological distress, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, gender differences, moderating effect of gender, Detroit Area Study
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Black or African American, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review