Cited by 9Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Influences on childhood depressive symptoms: the effects of trauma and distress tolerance across age and sex groups

Rette, Danielle N., Arnold, Molly S., McDonald, Erin M., Hoptman, Matthew J., Collins, Katherine A., Iosifescu, Dan V.·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depression affects many children and adolescents, leading to poor academic performance, impaired psychosocial functioning, and an increased frequency of suicidal behavior. Depression has also been notably associated with trauma and distress tolerance. Our study sought to understand the relationships of these variables across age and sex categories in youth and adolescents.Methods The current study examined data from a total of 324 participants between the ages of 7 and 17 years-old who were a part of a larger study. Data related to age, sex, depression, trauma, and distress tolerance were examined.Results A multiple regression revealed a significant interaction between age and sex on depression severity. Further, trauma and age by sex categories significantly predicted depression score, as well as distress tolerance predicting depression score. Lastly, a regression analysis, including trauma, distress tolerance, and age by sex categories were significant predictors of depression.Limitations The results are limited by the cross-sectional design.Conclusion Clinicians should consider age by sex effects when treating childhood depression. Future research should further the understanding of depression across age and sex groups, as well as among children with extensive trauma experiences. Future research should also seek to further understand the implications of distress tolerance therapy on childhood depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.064

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research suggests that DT may function differently depending on age, gender, sample type, and DT measurement type.

    “For instance, research suggests that DT may function differently depending on variables such as age (Rette et al., 2021), gender (Daughters et al., 2014), sample type (i.e., whether participants are from a clinical or non-clinical population; Tonarely and Ehrenreich-May 2020), and DT measurement type (Glassman et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rette, D. N., Arnold, M. S., McDonald, E. M., Hoptman, M. J., Collins, K. A., & Iosifescu, D. V.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Rette, Danielle N.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
283
Pages
373-376
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126897583
Cited by
9
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
childhood depression, depressive symptoms, trauma, distress tolerance, age differences, sex differences, adolescents, youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Humans, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review