Cited by 48Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Association between perinatal pain and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mo, Jianlan, Ning, Zhipeng, Wang, Xiaoxia, Lv, Feng, Feng, Jifeng, Pan, Linghui·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Introduction In recent years, clinical studies have shown that perinatal pain could increase the risk of postpartum depression, while such a conclusion appears controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association between perinatal pain and postpartum depression, and to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural labor analgesia in reducing the risk of postpartum depression. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to Jan 30th, 2022. The effect size of the meta-analysis was calculated using odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software. Results There were 19 studies included with a total of 96,378 patients. Among the included studies, 10 investigated the association between perinatal pain and the risk of postpartum depression, and 9 reported that between labor analgesia and the risk of postpartum depression. The results of meta-analysis showed that perinatal pain increased the risk of postpartum depression [OR = 1.43, 95% CI (1.23, 1.67), p Limitations Source of heterogeneity in the association between perinatal pain and PPD could not be identified due to the limitations of the original studies. There were mainly cohort studies included in the assessment for effectiveness of epidural analgesia in reducing the incidence of postpartum pain. Therefore, we look forward to more RCTs to confirm our results. Conclusion Perinatal pain…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.010

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mo, J., Ning, Z., Wang, X., Lv, F., Feng, J., & Pan, L.
Affiliations
Guangxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Pan, Linghui
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
312
Pages
92-99
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282923778
Cited by
48
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
perinatal pain, postpartum depression, epidural analgesia, labor analgesia, risk factors, perinatal mental health
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Analgesia, Epidural, Depression, Postpartum, Labor Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review