Cited by 22Child Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Attachment mediates the link between childhood maltreatment and loneliness in persistent depressive disorder

Sabaß, L., Buchenrieder, N., Rek, S.V., Nenov-Matt, T., Lange, J., Barton, B.B., Musil, R., Jobst, A. +2 more·2022·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background A central concept of attachment theory is that early experiences with close attachment figures shape the way we interact with and relate to other social partners throughout life. As such, early experiences of childhood maltreatment (CM) have been suggested as a key precursor of adult insecure attachment representations. As CM has been linked to feelings of loneliness in adulthood, this study examines whether insecure attachment could explain the relationship between CM and loneliness. Also, the moderating role of a diagnosis of persistent depressive disorder (PDD) is investigated, a disorder characterized by high levels of CM and loneliness. Method 60 patients with PDD (DSM-5) and 60 gender- and age-matched non-clinical control participants (NC) completed self-report questionnaires measuring attachment, loneliness, and CM. Mediation analyses (PDD as a moderator) were performed. Results PDD patients reported higher levels of CM, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and loneliness than NC. CM was positively associated with loneliness in both groups. Mediation analyses demonstrated that the relationship between CM and loneliness was mediated by avoidant, but not anxious attachment, regardless of a diagnosis of PDD. Limitations Caution when interpreting these results is crucial as the study lacked a clinical control group, relied on self-report measures, and the cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences. Conclusions All constructs studied…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.021

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabaß, L., Buchenrieder, N., Rek, S. V., Nenov-Matt, T., Lange, J., Barton, B. B., Musil, R., Jobst, A., Padberg, F., & Reinhard, M. A.
Affiliations
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Hochschule Fresenius (DE)
Corresponding author
Sabaß, L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
312
Pages
61-68
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283073155
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
child abuse, loneliness, dysthymia, insecure attachment, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Loneliness, Object Attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review