Correlates of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes in US Children
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the quality of the current intakes of fruits and vegetables compared to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans in US children and adolescents and identify factors related to low fruit and vegetable intake. This descriptive study examined differences in fruit and vegetable intakes by age, sex, ethnicity, poverty level, body mass index, and food security status utilizing data from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Six thousand five hundred thirteen children and adolescents ages 2 to 18 years, who were respondents to the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Mean fruit and vegetable intakes were computed using 24-hour recalls for individuals and compared using analysis of variance. Leading contributors to fruit and vegetable intake were identified using frequency analysis. Children aged 2 to 5 years had significantly higher total fruit and juice intakes than 6- to 11- and 12- to 18-year-olds. Total vegetable and french fry intake was significantly higher among 12- to 18-year-old adolescents. Regarding sex differences, boys consumed significantly more fruit juice and french fries than girls. In addition, non-Hispanic African-American children and adolescents consumed significantly more dark-green vegetables and fewer mean deep-yellow vegetables than Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white children and adolescents. Total fruit consumption also differed significantly among race/ethnicities and household income. Children and adolescents most at risk for higher intakes of energy-dense fruits and vegetables (fruit juice and french fries) were generally boys, and adolescents, at risk for overweight or overweight and living in households below 350% of the poverty level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research suggests that food waste in US public schools is substantial in magnitude and value.
“Previous research suggests that food waste in US public schools is substantial in magnitude and value (8,16,17) .”
From ‘It's just so much waste.’ A qualitative investigation of food waste in a universal free School Breakfast Program (2015) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 344
- Authors
- Lorson, B. A., Melgar-Quinonez, H. R., & Taylor, C. A.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 474-478
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136584381
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 28.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- fruit and vegetable intake, children and adolescents, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, fruit juice, French fries, energy-dense foods, sex differences, race and ethnicity, household income, poverty, body mass index, overweight, food security, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fruit, Humans, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Requirements, Poverty, United States, Vegetables, Body Mass Index, Adolescent Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Nutrition Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review