Snacking Is Associated with Overall Diet Quality among Adults
Abstract
Snacking occasions are considered to contribute little more than energy to the diet; however, few studies have examined the role of snacking on overall diet quality. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between snacking frequency and overall diet quality. This study included 11,209 adults aged 20 years and older who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Twenty-four-hour dietary recall data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 were used to assess snacking frequency and diet quality. Diet quality was assessed with the US Department of Agriculture's Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005). To adjust for confounding variables, multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the association between snacking frequency and HEI-2005 score, whereas the relationship between snacking frequency and HEI-2005 component scores were examined with Tobit regression models. Contrary to expectation, snacking was modestly associated (P<0.001) with higher total HEI-2005 scores (49.3±0.5, 49.9±0.3, 50.9±0.3, 51.9±0.4, and 51.6±0.6 for snacking zero, one, two, three, and four or more times per day, respectively). Total fruit (P<0.001), whole fruit (P<0.001), whole grains (P<0.001), milk (P<0.001), oils (P<0.001), and sodium (P<0.001) component scores were positively associated with snacking frequency. Inverse associations between snacking frequency and total vegetables (P=0.009); meat and beans (P=0.045); and the energy from solid fat, alcohol, and added sugars (P=0.007) components were observed. Although the magnitude of the association between snacking and overall diet quality was modest, snacking was associated with a more nutrient-dense diet. Focusing on the contribution snacking may have on single nutrient intakes may overlook its total nutritional impact.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mean score for HEI-2005 increased with increased daily snacking frequency among US adults, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, BMI, eating three or more meals daily and energy intake from meals.
“The mean score for HEI-2005 also increased with increased daily snacking frequency (for example, no snacks = 49·3 (se 0·5) v. ≥ 4 snacks = 51·5 (se 0·6), P< 0·001) among US adults, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, BMI, eating three or more meals daily and EI from meals( 89 ).”
From Understanding meal patterns: definitions, methodology and impact on nutrient intake and diet quality (2015) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Eating frequency: methodological and dietary aspects
Gatenby, S. J. (1997) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19970100 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Periodicity of eating and human health: present perspective and future directions
Gibney, M. J., & wolever, T. M. S. (1997) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19970099 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding meal patterns: definitions, methodology and impact on nutrient intake and diet quality
Leech, R. M., Worsley, A., Timperio, A., & McNaughton, S. A. (2015) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422414000262 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Hess, J. M., Jonnalagadda, S. S., & Slavin, J. L. (2016) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.115.009571 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Facilitators and barriers to weight loss and weight loss maintenance: a qualitative exploration
Metzgar, C. J., Preston, A. G., Miller, D. L., & Nickols‐Richardson, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12273 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Characterizing eating patterns: a comparison of eating occasion definitions
Leech, R. M., Worsley, A., Timperio, A., & McNaughton, S. A. (2015) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.114660 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
O’Connor, L., Brage, S., Griffin, S. J., Wareham, N. J., & Forouhi, N. G. (2015) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s000711451500269x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Eicher-Miller, H. A., Khanna, N., Boushey, C. J., Gelfand, S. B., & Delp, E. J. (2016) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.014 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Mesas, A. E., Guallar-Castillón, P., León-Muñoz, L. M., Graciani, A., López-Garíca, E., Gutiérrez-Fisac, J. L., Banegas, J. R., & RodrÍguez-Artalejo, F. (2012) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.112.158154 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Alencar, M. K., Beam, J. R., McCormick, J. J., White, A. C., Salgado, R. M., Kravitz, L. R., Mermier, C. M., Gibson, A. L., Conn, C. A., Kolkmeyer, D., et al. (2015) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2015.03.003 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zizza, C. A., & Xu, B.
- Affiliations
- Auburn University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zizza, Claire A.
- ORCID
- Xu, Beibei
- Venue
- Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-296
- ISSN
- 2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998656196
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- snacking frequency, diet quality, Healthy Eating Index-2005, nutrient intake, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, dairy consumption, sodium intake, energy intake, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Energy Intake, Edible Grain, Choice Behavior, Dairy Products, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fruit, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Vegetables, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review