Cited by 84Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Snacking Is Associated with Overall Diet Quality among Adults

Zizza, Claire A., Xu, Beibei·2012·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Snacking occasions are considered to contribute little more than energy to the diet; however, few studies have examined the role of snacking on overall diet quality. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between snacking frequency and overall diet quality. This study included 11,209 adults aged 20 years and older who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Twenty-four-hour dietary recall data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004 were used to assess snacking frequency and diet quality. Diet quality was assessed with the US Department of Agriculture's Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005). To adjust for confounding variables, multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the association between snacking frequency and HEI-2005 score, whereas the relationship between snacking frequency and HEI-2005 component scores were examined with Tobit regression models. Contrary to expectation, snacking was modestly associated (P<0.001) with higher total HEI-2005 scores (49.3±0.5, 49.9±0.3, 50.9±0.3, 51.9±0.4, and 51.6±0.6 for snacking zero, one, two, three, and four or more times per day, respectively). Total fruit (P<0.001), whole fruit (P<0.001), whole grains (P<0.001), milk (P<0.001), oils (P<0.001), and sodium (P<0.001) component scores were positively associated with snacking frequency. Inverse associations between snacking frequency and total vegetables (P=0.009); meat and beans (P=0.045); and the energy from solid fat, alcohol, and added sugars (P=0.007) components were observed. Although the magnitude of the association between snacking and overall diet quality was modest, snacking was associated with a more nutrient-dense diet. Focusing on the contribution snacking may have on single nutrient intakes may overlook its total nutritional impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mean score for HEI-2005 increased with increased daily snacking frequency among US adults, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, BMI, eating three or more meals daily and energy intake from meals.

    “The mean score for HEI-2005 also increased with increased daily snacking frequency (for example, no snacks = 49·3 (se 0·5) v. ≥ 4 snacks = 51·5 (se 0·6), P< 0·001) among US adults, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, BMI, eating three or more meals daily and EI from meals( 89 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zizza, C. A., & Xu, B.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Zizza, Claire A.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
291-296
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998656196
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
snacking frequency, diet quality, Healthy Eating Index-2005, nutrient intake, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, dairy consumption, sodium intake, energy intake, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Edible Grain, Choice Behavior, Dairy Products, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Fruit, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Vegetables, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review