CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 380Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAdolescent Health and BehaviorsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of associations among religiosity/spirituality and adolescent health attitudes and behaviors

Rew, Lynn, Wong, Y. Joel·2006·Journal of Adolescent Health
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.02.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose To systematically review and synthesize literature concerning the relationships among religiosity, spirituality, health attitudes, and health behaviors in adolescents.Methods Forty-three studies between 1998 and 2003 were systematically reviewed to (a) determine if the studies were based on conceptual or theoretical frameworks, (b) identify the types of religiosity and spirituality measures used as well as their effects on health attitudes and behaviors, (c) evaluate the quality of these measures, (d) determine categories and frequency of measures of health attitudes and behaviors, (e) evaluate the quality of the research designs, and (f) determine the effects of religiosity or spirituality on adolescent health attitudes and behaviors.Results Over half (n = 26) the studies were atheoretical or had an unclear framework and the other half were based on a wide variety of conceptual and theoretical models. A total of 37 distinct religiosity/spirituality variables were identified and varied in specificity. Less than half (n = 21) reported reliability of the measures and only seven contained information about validity of the measures. All 43 studies included measures of health-risk behaviors and/or attitudes but only seven addressed health-promoting behaviors. Most studies (84%) showed that measures of religiosity/spirituality had positive effects on health attitudes and behaviors.Conclusions The variety of studies and measures indicate that religiosity and spirituality may be important correlates of adolescent health attitudes and behaviors. Although the majority of the studies reviewed were well designed, there was no consistency in the theoretical bases and operational definitions of religiosity/spirituality phenomena.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.02.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bridges, 2002, Religious involvement and children’s well-being, Child Trends Res Brief, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 380

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rew, L., & Wong, Y. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Rew, Lynn
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
433-442
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.02.004
OpenAlex
W2171293029
Cited by
380
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 33
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Systematics Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, adolescents, health attitudes, health behavior, health risk behaviors, health-promoting behaviors, religiosity measurement, reliability and validity, theoretical framework
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Male, Religion, Research Design, Health Behavior, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review