Cited by 86Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Adolescents' Nonmedical Use of Prescription Medications and Other Problem Behaviors

Open access
Boyd, Carol J., Young, Amy, Grey, Melissa, McCabe, Sean Esteban·2009·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose This study examines adolescent nonmedical use of prescription medications (NUPM) and its relationship to other problem behaviors.Methods A secondary analysis was conducted with data gathered from 912 adolescents in 2007. Four mutually exclusive groups were created from the data. Adolescents who: 1) did not use controlled prescription medications (nonusers); 2) used their own controlled medications as prescribed (medical-users); 3) engaged in nonmedical use for self-treatment motivations (self-treaters), and 4) engaged in nonmedical use for sensation-seeking motivations (sensation-seekers). These four groups were compared on problem behaviors as well as depression and impulsivity.Results Approximately 10.9% of the sample engaged in NUPM and 36.8% had a legal prescription for a controlled medication. Sensation-seekers were more likely to engage in most problem behaviors when compared with all other groups; impulsivity and depression was variable among groups.Conclusions The findings suggest there are different subtypes of nonmedical users of prescription medications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.023

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyd, C. J., Young, A., Grey, M., & McCabe, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Boyd, Carol J.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
543-550
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074146542
Cited by
86
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R03AA014601)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA018272, R03DA020899, R01DA024678, R03DA018239)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
adolescents, controlled substances, sensation seeking, self-medication, behavioral problems, depression, impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Michigan, Conduct Disorder, Prescription Drugs, Off-Label Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review