Cited by 33Reproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Adolescent awareness of the changing legal landscape of abortion in the United States and its implications

Open access
Allison, Bianca A., Vear, Kinsey, Hoopes, Andrea J., Maslowsky, Julie·2023·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Restrictions on abortion in the United States will have disproportionate and negative impacts on adolescents. Prior to the Supreme Court ruling to overturn federal protection of abortion, we sought to examine adolescents' awareness and knowledge about the legal landscape of abortion and how changes might affect them.Methods We fielded a 5-question open-ended survey via text message to a nationwide sample of adolescents aged 14-24 years on May 20, 2022. We coded the responses using inductive consensus coding. Summary statistics were calculated for code frequencies and demographic data, and analyzed qualitatively using visual inspection of results overall and by subgroups (e.g., age, race and ethnicity, gender, and restrictiveness of state of residence).Results A total of 654 responded (79% response rate), of which 11% were under 18 years. Most adolescents were aware of potential changes to abortion access. Most adolescents reported using the internet and social media for information about abortions. Overall, negative emotions about the changing legal landscape predominated, including anger, fear, and sadness. When considering factors for abortion decisions, adolescents most often discussed finances and life circumstances including their future, age, education, maturity, and emotional stability. Themes were relatively, uniformly distributed across subgroups.Discussion Our study suggests that many adolescents are aware of and concerned about potential impacts of abortion restrictions, across a diversity of ages, gender, racial/ethnic, and geographic perspectives. Understanding and amplifying the voices of adolescents during this critical time is necessary to inform novel access solutions and policy initiatives that center the needs of youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.04.008

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents are aware of the changes to U.S. abortion policy that have resulted from Dobbs and its implications for abortion access.

    “Further, adolescents are aware of the changes to U.S. abortion policy that have resulted from Dobbs and its implications for abortion access, demonstrating their attention to and knowledge of the issue in general (Allison et al., 2023).”

    From The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights (2024) · cites this paper as Allison et al., 2023

    The Discussion reports that adolescents knew about the changing legal landscape and identified consequences of restricted abortion access. But the Abstract says the survey was conducted on May 20, 2022, before the Supreme Court ruling; it measured awareness of potential changes after the leaked opinion, not awareness of changes that had already resulted from Dobbs. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lindberg LD, Kantor LM. Adolescents' receipt of sex education in a na- tionally representative sample, 2011e2019. J Adolesc Health 2022;70: 290e7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allison, B. A., Vear, K., Hoopes, A. J., & Maslowsky, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Allison, Bianca A.
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
230-236
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378980648
Cited by
32
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD091416, K12HS026369)
  • Society of Family Planning (SFPRF15-CM2, SFPRF16-IAA1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
abortion restrictions, abortion access, adolescents, abortion knowledge, abortion policy, youth health policy, reproductive health
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Abortion, Legal, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review