Cited by 25Reproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescents and Abortion Restrictions: Disproportionate Burdens and Critical Warnings

Open access
Ralph, Lauren, Hasselbacher, Lee·2023·Journal of Adolescent Health

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aiken, 2022, Requests for self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in 30 US states before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, JAMA, 328, 1768, 10.1001/jama.2022.18865 · DOI
  2. Ralph, 2021, Reasons for and logistical burdens of judicial bypass for abortion, J Adolesc Health, 68, 71, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.025 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Stevenson, 2022, Decline in abortions by age group in the first six months of Texas Senate Bill 8 enforcement, SocArXiv
  4. Barr-Walker, 2019, Experiences of women who travel for abortion: A mixed methods systematic review, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0209991 · DOI
  5. Ralph, 2022, A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States, Repr Health, 19
  6. Fuentes, 2018, Adolescents’ and young adults’ reports of barriers to confidential health care and receipt of contraceptive services, J Adoles Health, 62, 36, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.011 · DOI
  7. Reddy, 2002, Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls’ use of sexual health care services, JAMA, 288, 710, 10.1001/jama.288.6.710 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ralph, L., & Hasselbacher, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
221-223
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384376896
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, San Francisco
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Keywords
abortion restrictions, adolescents, abortion access, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, state abortion bans, abortion providers, reproductive health policy
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Induced, Abortion, Legal, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review