CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82Nanocomposite Films for Food PackagingProteins in Food SystemsMicroencapsulation and Drying Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 241 of the 242 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pea protein and starch: Functional properties and applications in edible films

Open access
Farshi, Parastou, Mirmohammadali, Seyedeh Nooshan, Rajpurohit, Bipin, Smith, J Scott, Li, Yonghui·2024·Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100927
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Edible films and coatings, composed of biological components such as proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides, play a pivotal role in various applications. While proteins from diverse plant sources, including maize, soy, and wheat, have been extensively explored for their film-forming capabilities, soybean protein remains predominant in edible films. Nonetheless, researchers have increasingly investigated alternative legume proteins, such as those derived from various beans, peanuts, and field peas, as potential candidates for edible film applications. Pea, ranked fourth globally in food legume production after soybean, peanuts, and dry beans, emerges as a promising source for edible film production. Pea protein, valued for its low cost, high protein content, and absence of genetic modifications, along with pea starch, a by-product of pea protein extraction, has become the focal point of numerous studies in edible film development. This comprehensive review focuses on the examination of pea protein isolate, pea starch, and the edible films derived from these compounds. Functional properties of both pea protein and pea starch are systematically discussed. Subsequently, we delve into the extraction methods of these components, progressing to the creation of edible films from these materials. It then delves into various characteristics of edible films produced from pea protein and pea starch, encompassing mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, transparency, and solubility. Additionally, the review explores the influence of factors such as pH, heating, plasticizers, and other treatments on these film properties. Studies highlighted in this review demonstrate that modified edible film solutions based on pea protein and pea starch exhibit considerable potential for diverse applications in both food and non-food sectors. The promising outcomes suggest that these compounds could be utilized to produce edible films tailored to specific requirements, offering new possibilities for advancements in various industries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100927

Cites

241 of 241 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–241 of 241

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 242 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Schneider, 2000, Peas: a European production of protein-rich materials for feed and food, Ind. Proteins, 8, 3
  2. Soral-Smietana, 2002, White bean varieties-a source of elements, dietary fibre and resistant starch, Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 11, 17
  3. Baldwin, 1997, Use of lipids in edible coatings for food products, Food Technol., 51, 56
  4. Commission, 2007, Commission directive 2007/68/EC of 27 November 2007 amending Annex IIIa to directive 2000/13/EC of the European parliament and of the council as regards certain food ingredients, Off. J. Eur. Union L, 310, 11
  5. Saxenaa, T.M. and A. Saxenab, Recent Advances in Processing of Peas..
  6. Boye, 2010, Comparison of the functional properties of pea, chickpea and lentil protein concentrates processed using ultrafiltration and isoelectric precipitation techniques, Food Res. Int., 43, 537, 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.021 · DOI
  7. Hoover, 2010, Composition, molecular structure, properties, and modification of pulse starches: a review, Food Res. Int., 43, 399, 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.001 · DOI
  8. Tyler, 1981, Air classification of legumes .1. Separation efficiency, yield, and composition of the starch and protein-fractions, Cereal Chem., 58, 144
  9. Hoover, 1991, Composition, structure, functionality, and chemical modification of legume starches: a review, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 69, 79, 10.1139/y91-012 · DOI
  10. Embuscado, 2009, vol. 9
  11. Kowalczyk, 2012, Effect of selected polysaccharides on physicochemical properties of edible films produced on the basis of pea proteins, ZYWNOSC-NAUKA TECHNOLOGIA JAKOSC, 19, 99
  12. Laohakunjit, 2004, Effect of plasticizers on mechanical and barrier properties of rice starch film, Starch - Stärke, 56, 348, 10.1002/star.200300249 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 2006, Plasticization of pea starch films with monosaccharides and polyols, J. Food Sci., 71, E253, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00075.x · DOI
  14. Mali, 2003, Effects of yam starch films on storability and quality of fresh strawberries (Fragaria ananassa), J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 7005, 10.1021/jf034241c · DOI
  15. Han, 2006, Physical and mechanical properties of pea starch edible films containing beeswax emulsions, J. Food Sci., 71, E290, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00088.x · DOI
  16. Choi, 2016, Effects of ph and salts on physical and mechanical properties of pea starch films, J. Food Sci., 81, E1716, 10.1111/1750-3841.13342 · DOI
  17. Zhang, 2006, Plasticization of pea starch films with monosaccharides and polyols, J. Food Sci., 71, E253, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00075.x · DOI
  18. Ortega-Toro, 2014, Properties of starch-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose based films obtained by compression molding, Carbohydr. Polym., 109, 155, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.059 · DOI
  19. Furia, 1973, vol. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 82

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Farshi, P., Mirmohammadali, S. N., Rajpurohit, B., Smith, J. S., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Yonghui
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
15
Pages
100927
ISSN
2666-1543 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100927
OpenAlex
W4389743661
Cited by
78
References
242
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 17
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Agriculture and Food Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (7003330)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
Keywords
pea protein, pea starch, edible films, edible coatings, functional properties, legume protein, protein extraction, mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, film transparency, plasticizers, pH effect, thermal effects, food packaging, non-food applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review