The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the relationship between biomass, percent groundcover and remote sensing indices across six winter cover crop fields in Maryland, United States
Open accessAbstract
Winter cover crops are an essential part of managing nutrient and sediment losses from agricultural lands. Cover crops lessen sedimentation by reducing erosion, and the accumulation of nitrogen in aboveground biomass results in reduced nutrient runoff. Winter cover crops are planted in the fall and are usually terminated in early spring, making them susceptible to senescence, frost burn, and leaf yellowing due to wintertime conditions. This study sought to determine to what extent remote sensing indices are capable of accurately estimating the percent groundcover and biomass of winter cover crops, and to analyze under what critical ranges these relationships are strong and under which conditions they break down. Cover crop growth on six fields planted to barley, rye, ryegrass, triticale or wheat was measured over the 2012–2013 winter growing season. Data collection included spectral reflectance measurements, aboveground biomass, and percent groundcover. Ten vegetation indices were evaluated using surface reflectance data from a 16-band CROPSCAN sensor. Restricting analysis to sampling dates before the onset of prolonged freezing temperatures and leaf yellowing resulted in increased estimation accuracy. There was a strong relationship between the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and percent groundcover ( r 2 = 0.93) suggesting that date restrictions effectively eliminate yellowing vegetation from analysis. The triangular vegetation index (TVI) was most accurate in estimating high ranges of biomass ( r 2 = 0.86), while NDVI did not experience a clustering of values in the low and medium biomass ranges but saturated in the higher range (>1500 kg/ha). The results of this study show that accounting for index saturation, senescence, and frost burn on leaves can greatly increase the accuracy of estimates of percent groundcover and biomass for winter cover crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation
Tucker, C. J. (1979) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 · Cited by 11,754
Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00096-2 · Cited by 9,869
A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
Huete, A. R. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-x · Cited by 7,948
Haboudane, D. (2004) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013 · Cited by 2,608
Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction
Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Stark, R., & Rundquist, D. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00289-9 · Cited by 2,183
Broge, N. H., & Leblanc, E. (2001) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00197-8 · Cited by 1,760
Perspectives on … Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc
Lee, A. (1997) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(97)90180-4 · Cited by 1,677
Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations
MCMASTER, G. (1997) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(97)00027-0 · Cited by 1,622
Satellite remote sensing of primary production
TUCKER, C. J., & SELLERS, P. J. (1986) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431168608948944 · Cited by 1,371
Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics
Thenkabail, P. S., Smith, R. B., & De Pauw, E. (2000) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(99)00067-x · Cited by 1,313
Cited by
West, H., Quinn, N., & Horswell, M. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111291 · Cited by 538
Yue, J., Yang, G., Tian, Q., Feng, H., Xu, K., & Zhou, C. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.022 · Cited by 423
Danilevicz, M. F., Bayer, P. E., Boussaid, F., Bennamoun, M., & Edwards, D. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13193976 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Prabhakara, K., Hively, W. D., & McCarty, G. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 88-102
- ISSN
- 0303-2434 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-8432
- OpenAlex
- W2010308608
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the relationship between biomass, percent groundcover and remote sensing indices across six winter cover crop fields in Maryland, United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.002
- The paper
- Prabhakara, K., Hively, W. D., & McCarty, G. W. (2015). Evaluating the relationship between biomass, percent groundcover and remote sensing indices across six winter cover crop fields in Maryland, United States. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.