Cited by 43Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Does Cognition Predict Treatment Response and Remission in Psychotherapy for Late-Life Depression?

Open access
Beaudreau, Sherry A., Rideaux, Tiffany, O'Hara, Ruth, Arean, Patricia·2015·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives To identify cognitive predictors of geriatric depression treatment outcome. Method Older participants completed baseline measures of memory and executive function, health, and baseline and post-treatment Hamilton Depression Scales (HAM-D) in a 12-week trial comparing psychotherapies (problem-solving vs. supportive; N = 46). We examined cognitive predictors to identify treatment responders (i.e., HAM-D scores reduced by ≥50%) and remitters (i.e., post-treatment HAM-D score ≤10). Results Empirically derived decision trees identified poorer performance on switching (i.e., Trails B), with a cut-score of ≥82 predicting psychotherapy responders. No other cognitive or health variables predicted psychotherapy outcomes in the decision trees. Conclusions Psychotherapies that support or improve the executive skill of switching may augment treatment response for older patients exhibiting executive dysfunction in depression. If replicated, Trails B has potential as a brief cognitive tool for clinical decision-making in geriatric depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.09.003

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In individuals with late-life depression, participants with relatively lower executive functioning showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms compared with those with relatively higher executive functioning during a CBT intervention.

    “Specifically, participants with relatively lower executive functioning showed greater reductions in depressive symptoms compared with those with relatively higher executive functioning during a CBT intervention.4”

    From Neuropsychological Functioning and Treatment Outcomes in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain. (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract Results report that poorer performance on an executive switching task predicted response to psychotherapy, defined in the Abstract Method as at least a 50% reduction in depression scores. But the trial compared problem-solving and supportive therapy, not CBT; the Discussion mentions CBT only when describing other research. The paper therefore does not establish the claimed comparison of symptom reductions during a CBT intervention. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaudreau, S. A., Rideaux, T., O'Hara, R., & Arean, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
215-219
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088048828
Cited by
43
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH074717, K24MH074717)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
geriatric depression, psychotherapy outcome, treatment response, remission, executive function, cognitive shifting, Trail Making Test Part B, memory, supportive therapy, cognitive predictors, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Decision Trees, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychotherapy, Remission Induction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Treatment Outcome, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review